Acidity (i.e., pH) measuring equipment, laboratory analysis-type, manufacturing · Texas

Thermo Fisher Scientific- Austin

Austin, TX · ~82 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Thermo Fisher Scientific- Austin runs at 6% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Acidity (i.e., pH) measuring equipment, laboratory analysis-type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Thermo Fisher Scientific- Austin: 0.2 TCR = 6% of Acidity (i.e., pH) measuring equipment, laboratory analysis-type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Thermo Fisher Scientific- Austin safety composite

Thermo Fisher Scientific- Austin scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 98% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 98% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Thermo Fisher Scientific- Austin held a steady TCR band

Thermo Fisher Scientific- Austin's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 1.1 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=1.1 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334516 · Austin, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.2 · 6% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/8
  • PHOTO Edgewater/Norwood
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~82 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Edgewater/Norwood (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Thermo Fisher Scientific- Austin in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Thermo Fisher Scientific- Austin averages 0.2 TCR (6% of the Acidity (i.e., pH) measuring equipment, laboratory analysis-type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Thermo Fisher Scientific- Austin TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=1.1 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Thermo Fisher Scientific- Austin falls in its industry

213 Acidity (i.e., pH) measuring e establishments

Safer than 98% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 8 Acidity (i.e., pH) measuring e employers in Texas.

Thermo Fisher Scientific- Austin (82 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 133 employees and a TCR of 1.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Thermo Fisher Scientific- Austin
Thermo Fisher Scientific- Austin (82 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 133 employees and a TCR of 1.2

Thermo Fisher Scientific- Austin has fewer employees than the Acidity (i.e., pH) measuring equipment, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.1 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334516 · TX · Austin

213 Acidity (i.e., pH) measuring equipment, laboratory analysis-type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,645 employers in Austin, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Edgewater/Norwood 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Thermo Electron Scientific Instruments, LLC 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Life Sciences: Beckman Coulter (Labcyte) - San Jose 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR FEI - Thermo Fisher 0.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE MORTELLARO'S NURSERY LTD SCHERTZ, TX 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE Midland 11700 Onyx Dr, Midland, TX 79706 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE Maverick Well Pluggers 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rocker A Well Service, Inc. 82 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ensign Services 11,325 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-TX-Austin-Giga Texas 8,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-Loc: CORP LOC - US Austin 6,911 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-CORP LOC - USA UNITED STATES - AST 5,272 FTE
NAT-TCR 103988 - Long Ridge Energy Generation 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 6354-MD04 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Amazon (Seattle) 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR MCF4 Solutions 0.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kansas Line 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store #648 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Renaissance Village Murrieta 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store #067 82 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.