Fence installation (except electronic containment fencing for pets) · California

Fencecorp, Inc (All Locations)

Riverside, CA · ~89 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fencecorp, Inc (All Locations) runs at 76% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Fence installation (except electronic containment fencing for pets) workplace, earning a grade B.

Fencecorp, Inc (All Locations): 2.1 TCR = 76% of Fence installation (except electronic containment fencing for pets) BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fencecorp, Inc (All Locations) safety composite

Fencecorp, Inc (All Locations) scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 47%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.1

2020→2024

Fencecorp, Inc (All Locations) injury rate improved

Fencecorp, Inc (All Locations)'s TCR fell 2.1 from 2.1 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 3.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=2.1 · 2021=3.5 · 2022=3.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238990 · Riverside, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 76% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #66/171
  • PHOTO Goodmanson Construct…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~89 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Goodmanson Construction, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Fencecorp, Inc (All Locations) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fencecorp, Inc (All Locations) averages 2.1 TCR (76% of the Fence installation (except electronic containment fencing for pets) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fencecorp, Inc (All Locations) TCR series: 2020=2.1 · 2021=3.5 · 2022=3 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Fencecorp, Inc (All Locations) falls in its industry

1,634 Fence installation (except ele establishments

Safer than 47% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #66 safest of 171 Fence installation (except ele employers in California.

Fencecorp, Inc (All Locations) (89 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Fencecorp, Inc (All Locations)
Fencecorp, Inc (All Locations) (89 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Fencecorp, Inc (All Locations) has more employees than the Fence installation (except electronic co median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 3.0 3.0 2 0 0
2021 3.5 2.3 3 0 0
2020 2.1 2.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238990 · CA · Riverside

1,634 Fence installation (except electronic containment fencing for pets) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 536 employers in Riverside, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Goodmanson Construction, Inc. 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ruston Paving Co., Inc - Durham, NC 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR CORE Facility Services, LLC 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Spencer Construction 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bud of California Broccoli 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE GMI - CA 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ramona 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE Booth Ranches LLC-BR1 89 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Riverside 8,676 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA-21 4,525 FTE
CITY-NEAR Riverside Community Hospital 2,354 FTE
CITY-NEAR 08681351 RIVERSIDE MED CENTER 2,349 FTE
NAT-TCR 2308 Martins Supermarket 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Sideburn Support Center 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Crown Cork & Seal - Bowling Green Plant 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Holly Hill #682 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE 104286 - USACE ERB Security Strength 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE 128-GREELEY 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mahen Homes 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0g85 - Strategic Initiatives Group 89 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.