Cable splicing (except electrical or fiber optic) · New York

CORE Facility Services, LLC

New York, NY · ~242 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CORE Facility Services, LLC runs at 76% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Cable splicing (except electrical or fiber optic) workplace, earning a grade B.

CORE Facility Services, LLC: 2.1 TCR = 76% of Cable splicing (except electrical or fiber optic) BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CORE Facility Services, LLC safety composite

CORE Facility Services, LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

CORE Facility Services, LLC: 1.8 → 2.3 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 3.6 TCR · DART/TCR 1.09× in 2024

CORE Facility Services, LLC's TCR rose 0.5 from 1.8 in 2016 to 2.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 3.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.09× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238990 · New York, NY AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 76% of ind

  • DART 2.3 DART
  • RANK #27/53
  • PHOTO Ruston Paving Co., I…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 46 inj
  • SIZE ~242 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ruston Paving Co., Inc - Durham, NC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

CORE Facility Services, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CORE Facility Services, LLC averages 2.1 TCR (76% of the Cable splicing (except electrical or fiber optic) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CORE Facility Services, LLC TCR series: 2016=1.8 · 2017=2.4 · 2018=1.8 · 2019=3.6 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=2.5 · 2022=1.4 · 2023=0.8 · 2024=2.3 · BLS 2.8

Where CORE Facility Services, LLC falls in its industry

1,634 Cable splicing (except electri establishments

Safer than 47% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #27 safest of 53 Cable splicing (except electri employers in New York.

CORE Facility Services, LLC (242 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate CORE Facility Services, LLC
CORE Facility Services, LLC (242 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9

CORE Facility Services, LLC has more employees than the Cable splicing (except electrical or fib median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.3 2.3 8 0 0
2023 0.8 0.4 2 0 0
2022 1.4 0.9 3 0 0
2021 2.5 2.5 5 0 0
2020 2.6 2.1 5 0 0
2019 3.6 3.6 11 0 0
2018 1.8 1.8 4 0 0
2017 2.4 2.4 5 0 0
2016 1.8 1.8 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238990 · NY · New York

1,634 Cable splicing (except electrical or fiber optic) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 1,952 employers in New York, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ruston Paving Co., Inc - Durham, NC 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Spencer Construction 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Goodmanson Construction, Inc. 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR FENCECORP, INC (ALL LOCATIONS) 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE RG&E West Ave 242 FTE
STATE-SIZE Excell Communications 242 FTE
STATE-SIZE L&L Painting Co., Inc. 242 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rosina Food Products, Inc. - Industrial 242 FTE
CITY-NEAR NYU Grossman School of Medicine 16,280 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorial Hospital Corporation (MEM) 14,781 FTE
CITY-NEAR NYU Langone Hospitals 12,389 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mount Sinai Medical Center 11,845 FTE
NAT-TCR Charlie Irwin Painting, LLC 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR TWI Sauget 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Mays Landing 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR American & Efird Gastonia Plant 56 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Gildan Yarns, LLC (Plant # 73) 242 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kewaunee Fabrications 242 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mt. Prospect 242 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hopkinsville 242 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.