Landscape care and maintenance services · New York

Field - New York Restoration Project

New York, NY · ~42 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Field - New York Restoration Project runs at 245% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Landscape care and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade F.

Field - New York Restoration Project: 11.0 TCR = 245% of Landscape care and maintenance services BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Field - New York Restoration Project safety composite

Field - New York Restoration Project scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.3

2022→2024

Field - New York Restoration Project injury rate improved

Field - New York Restoration Project's TCR fell 8.3 from 16.5 in 2022 to 8.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 16.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.25× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=16.5 · 2023=8.3 · 2024=8.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561730 · New York, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.0 · 245% of ind

  • DART 2.8 DART
  • RANK #82/92
  • PHOTO Maine
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Maine (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Field - New York Restoration Project in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Field - New York Restoration Project averages 11.0 TCR (245% of the Landscape care and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Field - New York Restoration Project TCR series: 2022=16.5 · 2023=8.3 · 2024=8.3 · BLS 4.5

Where Field - New York Restoration Project falls in its industry

2,875 Landscape care and maintenance establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #82 safest of 92 Landscape care and maintenance employers in New York.

Field - New York Restoration Project (42 employees, TCR 11.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Field - New York Restoration Project
Field - New York Restoration Project (42 employees, TCR 11.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Field - New York Restoration Project has fewer employees than the Landscape care and maintenance services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.3 2.8 2 1 0
2023 8.3 5.5 2 1 0
2022 16.5 16.5 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561730 · NY · New York

2,875 Landscape care and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 1,952 employers in New York, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Maine 11.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR CurbSide Landscape & Irrigation 11.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tree Sculpture Group dba Terra Landscape 11.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bucyrus Ryan Outdoor Living 11.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE W D Henry & Sons Inc 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kreher Sunrise Farms LLC 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Genex Cooperative - Ithaca 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE IA Construction Management Inc. 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR NYU Grossman School of Medicine 16,280 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorial Hospital Corporation (MEM) 14,781 FTE
CITY-NEAR NYU Langone Hospitals 12,389 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mount Sinai Medical Center 11,845 FTE
NAT-TCR Honey's Air Inc. 11.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Trulife Bellingham 11.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Kamps Pallets Taylor 11.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - DLV2 11.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Frontier Cooling 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Northern Logistics Inc. , Taylor 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Star America, Inc. 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Schiavone Construction T100.582 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.