Professional Services to DHS US Citizenship and Immigration SVS · Georgia

Field Office Support Services FOSS ATL

Atlanta, GA · ~23 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.9
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Field Office Support Services FOSS ATL runs at 148% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Professional Services to DHS US Citizenship and Immigration SVS workplace, earning a grade D.

Field Office Support Services FOSS ATL: 3.9 TCR = 148% of Professional Services to DHS US Citizenship and Immigration SVS BLS 2.6 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Field Office Support Services FOSS ATL safety composite

Field Office Support Services FOSS ATL scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.7

2016→2017

Field Office Support Services FOSS ATL injury rate improved

Field Office Support Services FOSS ATL's TCR fell 7.7 from 7.7 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 7.7 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.7 · 2017=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561110 · Atlanta, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.9 · 148% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #15/16
  • PHOTO Administrative Annex
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Administrative Annex (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Field Office Support Services FOSS ATL in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Field Office Support Services FOSS ATL averages 3.9 TCR (148% of the Professional Services to DHS US Citizenship and Immigration SVS BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Field Office Support Services FOSS ATL TCR series: 2016=7.7 · 2017=0 · BLS 2.6

Where Field Office Support Services FOSS ATL falls in its industry

544 Professional Services to DHS U establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 16 Professional Services to DHS U employers in Georgia.

Field Office Support Services FOSS ATL (23 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 117 employees and a TCR of 1.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Field Office Support Services FOSS ATL
Field Office Support Services FOSS ATL (23 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 117 employees and a TCR of 1.2

Field Office Support Services FOSS ATL has fewer employees than the Professional Services to DHS US Citizens median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 7.7 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561110 · GA · Atlanta

544 Professional Services to DHS US Citizenship and Immigration SVS employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 1,907 employers in Atlanta, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Administrative Annex 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Field Office Support Services FOSS SNA 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR St Louis 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mt. Hood Management 3.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Canon Pullet 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Clermont Hatchery 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hatchery 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE ROSSMAN APIARIES LLC 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR Insight Global 20,586 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL Airport 19,423 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL- Airport 18,018 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northside 13,761 FTE
NAT-TCR Holiday Inn Fairborn 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 96 Cannon Falls, MN - Production 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Alamance Foods - Worth Street Plant 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 107 FAMILY FARE -Wyoming MI FF LLC #38-2750461 3.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tishler Industries Incorporated 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE TPC 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0614 - Yuba City, Ca 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0533 - Yakima, Wa 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.