Electrical generating and transmission equipment repair and maintenance services · Florida

Field Service Orlando

Orlando, FL · ~2,976 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Field Service Orlando runs at 40% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Electrical generating and transmission equipment repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade A.

Field Service Orlando: 0.8 TCR = 40% of Electrical generating and transmission equipment repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Field Service Orlando safety composite

Field Service Orlando scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Field Service Orlando: 0.4 → 1.2 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 1.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.76× in 2019

Field Service Orlando's TCR rose 0.8 from 0.4 in 2017 to 1.2 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 0.76× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Orlando, FL AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 40% of ind

  • DART 0.6 DART
  • RANK #15/122
  • PHOTO 511 Peoria Proving G…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 72 inj
  • SIZE ~2,976 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 511 Peoria Proving Grounds Tech Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Field Service Orlando in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Field Service Orlando averages 0.8 TCR (40% of the Electrical generating and transmission equipment repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Field Service Orlando TCR series: 2017=0.4 · 2018=0.9 · 2019=1.2 · BLS 2.1

Where Field Service Orlando falls in its industry

2,560 Electrical generating and tran establishments

Safer than 90% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 122 Electrical generating and tran employers in Florida.

Field Service Orlando (2,976 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Field Service Orlando
Field Service Orlando (2,976 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Field Service Orlando has more employees than the Electrical generating and transmission e median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 1.2 0.6 35 0 0
2018 0.9 0.5 24 2 0
2017 0.4 0.1 13 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · FL · Orlando

2,560 Electrical generating and transmission equipment repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,997 employers in Orlando, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 511 Peoria Proving Grounds Tech Center 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kenco Material Handling Solutions Madison 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR PS DO RNA Field Services 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Joy Global dba/ Komatsu Mining 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Holy Cross Long Term Care Inc 2,979 FTE
STATE-SIZE North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : MIA1 2,968 FTE
STATE-SIZE First Coast Security Solutions 2,997 FTE
STATE-SIZE Holy Cross Nursing Network 2,937 FTE
CITY-NEAR Universal Orlando Resort 20,343 FTE
CITY-NEAR Universal Parks and Resorts : UO 13,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR ADVENTHEALTH ORLANDO 11,412 FTE
CITY-NEAR Florida Hospital Orlando 10,318 FTE
NAT-TCR Ah4r - Ca 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Leprino Foods Company, Denver 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Brooks Construction Services, Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Perrigo : Minnesota (PMN) 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Honda Mfg. of Indiana, LLC 2,975 FTE
NAT-SIZE ChildCare Careers 2,972 FTE
NAT-SIZE Takeda: USA Field Sales Employees 2,980 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mercy St. Vincent Medical Center 2,971 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.