Forklift repair and maintenance services · Alabama

Kenco Material Handling Solutions Madison

Madison, AL · ~24 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kenco Material Handling Solutions Madison runs at 40% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Forklift repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade A.

Kenco Material Handling Solutions Madison: 0.8 TCR = 40% of Forklift repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kenco Material Handling Solutions Madison safety composite

Kenco Material Handling Solutions Madison scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Kenco Material Handling Solutions Madison held a steady TCR band

Kenco Material Handling Solutions Madison's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 4.2 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=4.2 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Madison, AL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 40% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/56
  • PHOTO 511 Peoria Proving G…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 511 Peoria Proving Grounds Tech Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Kenco Material Handling Solutions Madison in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kenco Material Handling Solutions Madison averages 0.8 TCR (40% of the Forklift repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kenco Material Handling Solutions Madison TCR series: 2016=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=4.2 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · BLS 2.1

Where Kenco Material Handling Solutions Madison falls in its industry

2,560 Forklift repair and maintenanc establishments

Safer than 90% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 56 Forklift repair and maintenanc employers in Alabama.

Kenco Material Handling Solutions Madison (24 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Kenco Material Handling Solutions Madison
Kenco Material Handling Solutions Madison (24 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Kenco Material Handling Solutions Madison has fewer employees than the Forklift repair and maintenance services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 4.2 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · AL · Madison

2,560 Forklift repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 131 employers in Madison, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 511 Peoria Proving Grounds Tech Center 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR PS DO RNA Field Services 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Field Service Orlando 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Joy Global dba/ Komatsu Mining 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Young's Plant Farm, Inc. (Farm 1) 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cherokee Gin & Cotton Company 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Snead Growout 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Morgan Energy Center 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mazda Toyota Manufacturing USA Inc 4,226 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mazda Toyota Manufacturing, U.S.A., Inc. 1,881 FTE
CITY-NEAR Polaris Industries 1,604 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0580 - Huntsville DC 1,312 FTE
NAT-TCR ES Boulos Auburn T & D 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR GEM Industrial Inc. - Walbridge 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR PS DO RNA Field Services 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Harrison Energy Partners Corp. 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE University Place Store #1602 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Service 5212 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE TXAlloy 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fields Services, Inc. 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.