Industrial and Commerical Fan and Blower and Air Purification Equipment Manufacturing · Missouri

Filtration : Slater GTF

Slater, MO · ~26 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Filtration : Slater GTF runs at 31% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Industrial and Commerical Fan and Blower and Air Purification Equipment Manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Filtration : Slater GTF: 1.0 TCR = 31% of Industrial and Commerical Fan and Blower and Air Purification Equipment Manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Filtration : Slater GTF safety composite

Filtration : Slater GTF scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Filtration : Slater GTF held a steady TCR band

Filtration : Slater GTF's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 7.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2020=7.1 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333413 · Slater, MO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 31% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/9
  • PHOTO Altec AIR, Llc
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Altec AIR, Llc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Filtration : Slater GTF in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Filtration : Slater GTF averages 1.0 TCR (31% of the Industrial and Commerical Fan and Blower and Air Purification Equipment Manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Filtration : Slater GTF TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2020=7.1 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Filtration : Slater GTF falls in its industry

232 Industrial and Commerical Fan establishments

Safer than 89% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 9 Industrial and Commerical Fan employers in Missouri.

Filtration : Slater GTF (26 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 85 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Filtration : Slater GTF
Filtration : Slater GTF (26 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 85 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Filtration : Slater GTF has fewer employees than the Industrial and Commerical Fan and Blower median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 7.1 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333413 · MO · Slater

232 Industrial and Commerical Fan and Blower and Air Purification Equipment Manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 7 employers in Slater, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Altec AIR, Llc 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR MEGTEC DePere 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Coway USA, Inc 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tri-Mer Corporation 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Knob Noster Pullets 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE MO96-SEL-HIGHWAY 96- HENS' 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Select Genetics MO Hwy 96 006-0138-96, 9G 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE KCP&L - Belton Service Cetner 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR Filtration : Slater IGFG 355 FTE
CITY-NEAR 8027595-Clacor Industrial Air 128 FTE
CITY-NEAR 8027595 Clacor Industrial Air 80 FTE
CITY-NEAR Filtration : Slater PMBU 50 FTE
NAT-TCR Steel Technologies Willoughby 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Decatur Ga Plant 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Fluid Connectors : Davenport 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Aid Electric Corporation 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Park Place of West Knoxville 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE CP Allen Construction, Inc. 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Webb Equipment Company, INC. 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bath & Body Works #1871 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.