Industrial and Comemerical Fan Blower and Air Purification Equipment Manufacturing · Missouri

Filtration : Slater IGFG

Slater, MO · ~355 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Filtration : Slater IGFG runs at 11% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Industrial and Comemerical Fan Blower and Air Purification Equipment Manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Filtration : Slater IGFG: 0.3 TCR = 11% of Industrial and Comemerical Fan Blower and Air Purification Equipment Manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Filtration : Slater IGFG safety composite

Filtration : Slater IGFG scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 98% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 98% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Filtration : Slater IGFG: 0.0 → 0.5 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 0.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2023

Filtration : Slater IGFG's TCR rose 0.5 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.5 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 0.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333413 · Slater, MO AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.3 · 11% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/9
  • PHOTO Filtration : Jeffers…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~355 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Filtration : Jeffersonville (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Filtration : Slater IGFG in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Filtration : Slater IGFG averages 0.3 TCR (11% of the Industrial and Comemerical Fan Blower and Air Purification Equipment Manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Filtration : Slater IGFG TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0.8 · 2019=0.4 · 2020=0 · 2021=0.5 · 2022=0.5 · 2023=0.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Filtration : Slater IGFG falls in its industry

232 Industrial and Comemerical Fan establishments

Safer than 98% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 9 Industrial and Comemerical Fan employers in Missouri.

Filtration : Slater IGFG (355 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 85 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Filtration : Slater IGFG
Filtration : Slater IGFG (355 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 85 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Filtration : Slater IGFG has more employees than the Industrial and Comemerical Fan Blower an median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.5 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.5 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.5 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.4 0.4 1 0 0
2018 0.8 0.0 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333413 · MO · Slater

232 Industrial and Comemerical Fan Blower and Air Purification Equipment Manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 7 employers in Slater, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Filtration : Jeffersonville 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Filtration : Corona 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Donaldson Company Inc 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Camfil USA, Inc. 0.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Watlow Hannibal 355 FTE
STATE-SIZE St Louis Tree Court 355 FTE
STATE-SIZE Westminster College 355 FTE
STATE-SIZE Curium US LLC 354 FTE
CITY-NEAR 8027595-Clacor Industrial Air 128 FTE
CITY-NEAR 8027595 Clacor Industrial Air 80 FTE
CITY-NEAR Filtration : Slater PMBU 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR Central Missouri AgriService LLC - Slater 28 FTE
NAT-TCR Filtration : Jeffersonville 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Corporate Office 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Arnold Machinery 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Deepwell Energy Services LLC. 0.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pca2 - County Attorney 355 FTE
NAT-SIZE Columbia & Okanogan Nursery 355 FTE
NAT-SIZE San Francisco Chronicle 355 FTE
NAT-SIZE Unity Behavioral Health 355 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.