Warehousing and Distribution · Michigan

Filtration : Total Filtration Services (TFS)

Auburn Hills, MI · ~173 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Filtration : Total Filtration Services (TFS) runs at 18% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Warehousing and Distribution workplace, earning a grade A.

Filtration : Total Filtration Services (TFS): 1.0 TCR = 18% of Warehousing and Distribution BLS 5.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Filtration : Total Filtration Services (TFS) safety composite

Filtration : Total Filtration Services (TFS) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.8

2018→2021

Filtration : Total Filtration Services (TFS) injury rate improved

Filtration : Total Filtration Services (TFS)'s TCR fell 0.8 from 1.5 in 2018 to 0.7 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 1.5 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.7× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=1.5 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=0.7 · 2021=0.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Auburn Hills, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 18% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #20/194
  • PHOTO Baltimore
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~173 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Baltimore (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Filtration : Total Filtration Services (TFS) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Filtration : Total Filtration Services (TFS) averages 1.0 TCR (18% of the Warehousing and Distribution BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Filtration : Total Filtration Services (TFS) TCR series: 2018=1.5 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=0.7 · 2021=0.7 · BLS 5.8

Where Filtration : Total Filtration Services (TFS) falls in its industry

9,477 Warehousing and Distribution establishments

Safer than 89% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #20 safest of 194 Warehousing and Distribution employers in Michigan.

Filtration : Total Filtration Services (TFS) (173 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Filtration : Total Filtration Services (TFS)
Filtration : Total Filtration Services (TFS) (173 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Filtration : Total Filtration Services (TFS) has more employees than the Warehousing and Distribution median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2020 0.7 0.0 1 0 0
2019 1.1 1.1 2 0 0
2018 1.5 0.5 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · MI · Auburn Hills

9,477 Warehousing and Distribution employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 215 employers in Auburn Hills, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Baltimore 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ability Tri-Modal - Benchmark 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Logistics Plus Inc. Chino 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fernley Distribution Center 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE City of Detroit Department of Public Works - Street Maintenance Division 173 FTE
STATE-SIZE LGC Global, Inc. 173 FTE
STATE-SIZE Salt-St. Clair 173 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kentwood Packaging Corp 173 FTE
CITY-NEAR FCA US Headquarters and Technology Center 14,088 FTE
CITY-NEAR FCA US Headquarters and Technology 12,609 FTE
CITY-NEAR Continental - Auburn Hills North 1,318 FTE
CITY-NEAR CTC Pilot Plant 1,094 FTE
NAT-TCR Holiday Inn Express Harrisburg East 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 43191e - Evansville Zone 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Chicago, IL office 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR FSP Atlanta 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Instrumentation : Washington SPO711 173 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ng-Ng-North Grove 173 FTE
NAT-SIZE BU-BU-BURLINGTON 173 FTE
NAT-SIZE STA-St. Louis 173 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.