Print shops, flexographic (except printing books) · Georgia

FineLine Technologies, Inc.

Norcross, GA · ~104 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

FineLine Technologies, Inc. runs at 112% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Print shops, flexographic (except printing books) workplace, earning a grade C.

FineLine Technologies, Inc.: 3.7 TCR = 112% of Print shops, flexographic (except printing books) BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

FineLine Technologies, Inc. safety composite

FineLine Technologies, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.2

2017→2023

FineLine Technologies, Inc. injury rate improved

FineLine Technologies, Inc.'s TCR fell 4.2 from 4.2 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 11.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.2 · 2018=1.2 · 2019=11.3 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=5.6 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · Norcross, GA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.7 · 112% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #38/51
  • PHOTO American Packaging C…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~104 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: American Packaging Corporation Chili (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

FineLine Technologies, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows FineLine Technologies, Inc. averages 3.7 TCR (112% of the Print shops, flexographic (except printing books) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

FineLine Technologies, Inc. TCR series: 2017=4.2 · 2018=1.2 · 2019=11.3 · 2020=0 · 2021=5.6 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where FineLine Technologies, Inc. falls in its industry

2,001 Print shops, flexographic (exc establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #38 safest of 51 Print shops, flexographic (exc employers in Georgia.

FineLine Technologies, Inc. (104 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate FineLine Technologies, Inc.
FineLine Technologies, Inc. (104 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

FineLine Technologies, Inc. has more employees than the Print shops, flexographic (except printi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 5.6 0.0 6 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 11.3 5.0 9 0 0
2018 1.2 1.2 1 0 0
2017 4.2 1.4 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · GA · Norcross

2,001 Print shops, flexographic (except printing books) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 337 employers in Norcross, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR American Packaging Corporation Chili 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brook & Whittle, Ltd. - Nashville 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sheridan Random Lake 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Seaway Printing Company 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE EC Electric Inc 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE Polk County Public Service, Inc. 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE Woodman Insulation Inc. 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE B&D Concrete Cutting, Inc. 104 FTE
CITY-NEAR Home Office 1,234 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ole Mexican Foods, Norcross 6585 866 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6585 844 FTE
CITY-NEAR NAPA ATLANTA 794 FTE
NAT-TCR Bodines Casino 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR USM Store #928 (ALBERTSONS MARKET) 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR RK-066-Coschocton ( RK-066 ) 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR McLean County Health Department 3.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fiberglass Pultrusion 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE Unit #2816 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE Unit #1980 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE Unit #1206 104 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.