Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing · New York

Finger Lakes Extrusion

Canandaigua, NY · ~21 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
17.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Finger Lakes Extrusion runs at 535% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Finger Lakes Extrusion: 17.7 TCR = 535% of Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Finger Lakes Extrusion safety composite

Finger Lakes Extrusion scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 17.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Finger Lakes Extrusion: 7.0 → 13.6 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 28.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Finger Lakes Extrusion's TCR rose 6.7 from 7.0 in 2016 to 13.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 28.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326121 · Canandaigua, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 17.7 · 535% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/9
  • PHOTO UMR Board Production…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 28 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: UMR Board Productions LLC (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Finger Lakes Extrusion in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Finger Lakes Extrusion averages 17.7 TCR (535% of the Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Finger Lakes Extrusion TCR series: 2016=7 · 2018=14.5 · 2019=26.6 · 2020=13.3 · 2021=28.4 · 2022=27.3 · 2023=10.7 · 2024=13.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Finger Lakes Extrusion falls in its industry

202 Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tub establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 9 Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tub employers in New York.

Finger Lakes Extrusion (21 employees, TCR 17.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Finger Lakes Extrusion
Finger Lakes Extrusion (21 employees, TCR 17.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Finger Lakes Extrusion has fewer employees than the Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrig median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 13.6 0.0 3 0 0
2023 10.7 10.7 2 0 0
2022 27.3 5.5 5 0 0
2021 28.4 8.1 7 0 0
2020 13.3 4.4 3 0 0
2019 26.6 5.3 5 0 0
2018 14.5 4.8 3 0 0
2016 7.0 7.0 0 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326121 · NY · Canandaigua

202 Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 59 employers in Canandaigua, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR UMR Board Productions LLC 17.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR CE North 15.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Champion Window of Columbia 20.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6681_15494 12.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Chambers Valley Farms, Inc. 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mulligan Family Farm LLC 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dziedzic Farms LLC 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pine Hollow Dairy LLC 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thompson Hospital 1,985 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hospital 1,816 FTE
CITY-NEAR Frederick Ferris Thompson Hospital 1,710 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pactiv Canandaigua Manufacturing Plant 507 FTE
NAT-TCR South Plains Community Action Association, Inc. 17.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Spencer 17.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Carter Caves State Resort Park 17.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Rentex Inc. Union City 17.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE PJF Corp 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Duer Construction Company 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Norman 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Metal Exchange LLC 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.