Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Oregon

Fircrest Senior Living

Mcminnville, OR · ~63 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fircrest Senior Living runs at 417% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Fircrest Senior Living: 15.8 TCR = 417% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fircrest Senior Living safety composite

Fircrest Senior Living scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−15.5

2017→2024

Fircrest Senior Living injury rate improved

Fircrest Senior Living's TCR fell 15.5 from 29.7 in 2017 to 14.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 29.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=29.7 · 2018=22.3 · 2019=13.1 · 2020=10.9 · 2021=21.4 · 2022=9.5 · 2023=5.7 · 2024=14.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Mcminnville, OR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.8 · 417% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #172/218
  • PHOTO SPRING ARBOR OF SEVE…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 52 inj
  • SIZE ~63 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SPRING ARBOR OF SEVERNA PARK (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Fircrest Senior Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fircrest Senior Living averages 15.8 TCR (417% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fircrest Senior Living TCR series: 2017=29.7 · 2018=22.3 · 2019=13.1 · 2020=10.9 · 2021=21.4 · 2022=9.5 · 2023=5.7 · 2024=14.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Fircrest Senior Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #172 safest of 218 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Oregon.

Fircrest Senior Living (63 employees, TCR 15.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Fircrest Senior Living
Fircrest Senior Living (63 employees, TCR 15.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Fircrest Senior Living has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 14.2 0.0 8 0 0
2023 5.7 0.0 3 0 0
2022 9.5 0.0 5 0 0
2021 21.4 17.2 3 7 0
2020 10.9 5.4 5 1 0
2019 13.1 8.7 6 0 0
2018 22.3 22.3 11 0 0
2017 29.7 4.0 11 4 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · OR · Mcminnville

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 94 employers in Mcminnville, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SPRING ARBOR OF SEVERNA PARK 15.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Falcon Point Labor, LLC 15.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Senior Living - Flagstaff 15.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Inspirations of Mount Washington 15.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Summit Reconstruction & Restoration 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Todd Construction, Inc. Main Office 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Emerick Construction 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Texstar - Aurora 63 FTE
CITY-NEAR Linfield College 943 FTE
CITY-NEAR WILLAMETTE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER 610 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cascade Steel Rolling Mills 400 FTE
CITY-NEAR CSS McMinnville 397 FTE
NAT-TCR Builder's Bloc Contracting Services, LLC 15.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Tom Deason Building Company, Inc. 15.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Hyatt Place Fresno 15.8 TCR
NAT-TCR CO013SWP 15.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Claremont Properties, Inc. 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Strait Steel, Inc. 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Medical Arts Bldg 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kendall Holdings 63 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.