Dumps, nonhazardous solid waste (e.g., trash) · Virginia

First Piedmont Corporation

Chatham, VA · ~84 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

First Piedmont Corporation runs at 134% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Dumps, nonhazardous solid waste (e.g., trash) workplace, earning a grade D.

First Piedmont Corporation: 3.5 TCR = 134% of Dumps, nonhazardous solid waste (e.g., trash) BLS 2.6 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

First Piedmont Corporation safety composite

First Piedmont Corporation scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 47%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

First Piedmont Corporation: 1.3 → 2.5 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 7.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.7× in 2022

First Piedmont Corporation's TCR rose 1.2 from 1.3 in 2016 to 2.5 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 7.1 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.7× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562212 · Chatham, VA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.5 · 134% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #7/15
  • PHOTO S04111 - Security RDF
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~84 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: S04111 - Security RDF (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

First Piedmont Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows First Piedmont Corporation averages 3.5 TCR (134% of the Dumps, nonhazardous solid waste (e.g., trash) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

First Piedmont Corporation TCR series: 2016=1.3 · 2017=3.6 · 2018=3.9 · 2019=3.8 · 2020=2.4 · 2021=7.1 · 2022=2.5 · BLS 2.6

Where First Piedmont Corporation falls in its industry

288 Dumps, nonhazardous solid wast establishments

Safer than 55% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 15 Dumps, nonhazardous solid wast employers in Virginia.

First Piedmont Corporation (84 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 32 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate First Piedmont Corporation
First Piedmont Corporation (84 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 32 employees and a TCR of 3.9

First Piedmont Corporation has more employees than the Dumps, nonhazardous solid waste (e.g., t median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 2.5 2.5 2 0 0
2021 7.1 5.0 5 2 0
2020 2.4 1.2 1 1 0
2019 3.8 2.5 3 0 0
2018 3.9 3.9 3 0 0
2017 3.6 1.8 4 0 0
2016 1.3 1.3 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562212 · VA · Chatham

288 Dumps, nonhazardous solid waste (e.g., trash) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 19 employers in Chatham, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR S04111 - Security RDF 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ecosouth services of Mobile LLC 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR S04816 - Refuse, Inc - Lockwood Landfill 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR M&M Sanitation 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE EXCEL PAVING CORPORATION 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE Technopref Industries 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Atlantic Company of America, Inc. 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE Woodson (Central Operations) Support Center 84 FTE
CITY-NEAR Green Rock Correctional Center 276 FTE
CITY-NEAR Davenport Energy, Inc. 167 FTE
CITY-NEAR Columbia Forest Products - Chatham Mill 161 FTE
CITY-NEAR 00464 - STORE # 464 CHATHAM 87 FTE
NAT-TCR Canton Distribution Center 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 481 - Shelby Township 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 557 - Westchase 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 816 - EFC3 Edgewood, MD 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pebble Creek Golf Club 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mystic 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE OlympiaTech Electric 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE O'Connell Elementary School 84 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.