Industry profile · NAICS 562212

Sanitary landfills

Workplace injury rates across 221 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

221
Employers
5.0
Avg TCR
2.6
BLS benchmark
3,476
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Sanitary landfills average 5.0 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.9 times the BLS national benchmark of 2.6.

5.0
avg TCR · reporting employers
2.6
BLS national benchmark
221
employers reporting
3,476
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Sanitary landfills Safety Data Reveals

The Sanitary landfills sector (NAICS 562212) encompasses 221 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 3,476 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 5.0 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 2.6 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 5.0 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Sanitary landfills that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 1 of 7
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Refuse Division - Honolulu Yard Honolulu, HI F 23.6
OCWR Olinda Alfa Landfill Brea, CA F 22.5
Public Works Refuse North Haven, CT F 22.5
Disposal & Environmental Protection San Diego, CA F 19.4
Town of Enfield Division of Solid Waste Enfield, CT F 18.9
Lane County Public Works Glenwood Eugene, OR F 17.8
East Central Solid Waste Commission Mora, MN F 17.4
Oak Ridge Waste & Recycling of CT LLC Danbury, CT F 17.3
Landfill Technologies, Vertedero de Fajardo Gurabo, PR F 16.0
Horry County SWA Conway, SC F 15.3
OCWR Frank R. Bowerman Landfill Irvine, CA F 15.3
Region 2000 Services Authority Rustburg, VA F 14.3
County of Maui Central Maui Landfill Puunene, HI F 13.5
Butler Hauling Operations and Sanitary Landfill Butler, KY F 13.2
El Coqui Landfill Humacao, PR F 13.1
Public Works Uncasville, CT F 12.8
Johnson Canyon Landfill Gonzales, CA F 12.8
OCWR Prima Deshecha Landfill San Juan Capistrano, CA F 12.8
SW Visalia Refuse Site Visalia, CA F 12.4
County of Stafford-Landfill Stafford, VA F 12.3
S03759 - WM of NM - Rio Rancho Landfill Rio Rancho, NM F 12.3
Solid Waste Susanville, CA F 12.1
Monterey Regional Waste Management District Monterey County, CA F 11.6
CWS Recogido Escombros Carolina Gurabo, PR F 11.5
Speedway Recycling and Landfill Facility Tucson, AZ F 11.5
Toland Santa Paula, CA F 11.4
Solid Waste Division Palmer, AK F 11.3
Modern Disposal Elk Street Buffalo, NY F 11.2
Westmoreland Sanitary Landfill LLC Belle Vernon, PA F 11.1
Public Services - Town of Black Mountain Black Mountain, NC F 10.8
Modern Disposal Model City Model City, NY F 10.7
Hanes Mill Landfill Winston-Salem, NC F 10.6
Sunshine Canyon Landfill - Republic Services Sylmar, CA F 10.6
Cedar Rapids Linn County Solid Waste Agency Marion, IA F 10.5
3130-Loess Hills Landfill Malvern, IA F 10.4
Puente Hills Field Office Whittier, CA F 10.1
Modern Disposal Jeffrey Blasdell, NY F 9.9
Refuse solid waste Johnston, RI F 9.8
Greater Greenville Sanitation Greenville, SC F 9.8
County of Spotsylvania Spotsylvania, VA F 9.6
Public Works Morganton, NC F 9.3
Landfill Smithfield, NC F 9.3
FR & S Inc. d/b/a Pioneer Crossing Landfill Birdsboro, PA F 9.1
Calabasas Landfill Agoura, CA F 9.1
VPPSA Williamsburg, VA F 9.1
Georgetown Hauling Operations and Sanitary Landfill Georgetown, OH F 9.0
Southeast Landfill Office Kennedale, TX F 8.9
Cincinnati Hauling Operations Cincinnati, OH F 8.8
Metro Park East Landfill Mitchellville, IA F 8.6
Johnson Canyon Landfill Salinas, CA F 8.5
Page 1 of 7 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Sanitary landfills?

This sector averages 5.0 against a BLS benchmark of 2.6 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.