Sanitary products made from purchased sanitary paper stock · Georgia

First Quality Baby Products

Macon, GA · ~379 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

First Quality Baby Products runs at 54% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Sanitary products made from purchased sanitary paper stock workplace, earning a grade B.

First Quality Baby Products: 1.8 TCR = 54% of Sanitary products made from purchased sanitary paper stock BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

First Quality Baby Products safety composite

First Quality Baby Products scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 62% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

First Quality Baby Products: 1.3 → 2.1 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 3.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.21× in 2024

First Quality Baby Products's TCR rose 0.9 from 1.3 in 2016 to 2.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.21× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322291 · Macon, GA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.8 · 54% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #1/5
  • PHOTO Nutek Disposables, I…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 62 inj
  • SIZE ~379 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Nutek Disposables, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

First Quality Baby Products in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows First Quality Baby Products averages 1.8 TCR (54% of the Sanitary products made from purchased sanitary paper stock BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

First Quality Baby Products TCR series: 2016=1.3 · 2018=1.3 · 2019=1.7 · 2020=0.3 · 2021=1.8 · 2022=3.3 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=2.1 · BLS 3.3

Where First Quality Baby Products falls in its industry

113 Sanitary products made from pu establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 5 Sanitary products made from pu employers in Georgia.

First Quality Baby Products (379 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 123 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate First Quality Baby Products
First Quality Baby Products (379 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 123 employees and a TCR of 2.3

First Quality Baby Products has more employees than the Sanitary products made from purchased sa median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.1 2.1 15 0 0
2023 2.4 1.7 15 0 0
2022 3.3 1.7 12 0 0
2021 1.8 1.4 5 0 0
2020 0.3 0.3 1 0 0
2019 1.7 1.1 6 0 0
2018 1.3 0.6 4 0 0
2016 1.3 0.7 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322291 · GA · Macon

113 Sanitary products made from purchased sanitary paper stock employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 300 employers in Macon, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Nutek Disposables, Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR ACON Investments 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hello Bello 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cascades Tissue Group North Carolina - Wagram 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Perry Carton Facility 379 FTE
STATE-SIZE Biolab, Inc. 379 FTE
STATE-SIZE ABB Motors and Mechanical Inc. 379 FTE
STATE-SIZE Purple South 379 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medical Center, Navicent Health 3,977 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1201-Navicent Health Medical Center 3,858 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : SAV3 1,528 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - SAV3 1,305 FTE
NAT-TCR Viper Northwest 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR MCL Construction 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Burtch Construction 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR OnPoint Digital Solutions, LLC 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Legacy Fruit Packers LLC 379 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lake Success 379 FTE
NAT-SIZE InterContinental Chicago Magnificent Mile 379 FTE
NAT-SIZE PCL Construction Services Inc. 379 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.