Hotels (except casino hotels) · Illinois

InterContinental Chicago Magnificent Mile

Chicago, IL · ~379 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.9
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

InterContinental Chicago Magnificent Mile runs at 163% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Hotels (except casino hotels) workplace, earning a grade D.

InterContinental Chicago Magnificent Mile: 4.9 TCR = 163% of Hotels (except casino hotels) BLS 3.0 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

InterContinental Chicago Magnificent Mile safety composite

InterContinental Chicago Magnificent Mile scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

InterContinental Chicago Magnificent Mile: 3.8 → 6.5 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 6.5 TCR · DART/TCR 1.12× in 2023

InterContinental Chicago Magnificent Mile's TCR rose 2.7 from 3.8 in 2017 to 6.5 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 1.12× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721110 · Chicago, IL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.9 · 163% of ind

  • DART 5.5 DART
  • RANK #185/345
  • PHOTO OSP Employees LLC
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 83 inj
  • SIZE ~379 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: OSP Employees LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

InterContinental Chicago Magnificent Mile in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows InterContinental Chicago Magnificent Mile averages 4.9 TCR (163% of the Hotels (except casino hotels) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

InterContinental Chicago Magnificent Mile TCR series: 2017=3.8 · 2018=3.6 · 2019=5.7 · 2020=3.7 · 2022=6 · 2023=6.5 · BLS 3.0

Where InterContinental Chicago Magnificent Mile falls in its industry

9,342 Hotels (except casino hotels) establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #185 safest of 345 Hotels (except casino hotels) employers in Illinois.

InterContinental Chicago Magnificent Mile (379 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate InterContinental Chicago Magnificent Mile
InterContinental Chicago Magnificent Mile (379 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8

InterContinental Chicago Magnificent Mile has more employees than the Hotels (except casino hotels) median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 6.5 5.5 18 1 0
2022 6.0 6.0 11 3 0
2020 3.7 3.7 4 0 0
2019 5.7 3.4 19 1 0
2018 3.6 1.9 15 0 0
2017 3.8 3.4 16 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721110 · IL · Chicago

9,342 Hotels (except casino hotels) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 2,934 employers in Chicago, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR OSP Employees LLC 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR SHAWNEE 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR LUMA Hotel San Francisco 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR CTH Suncadia LLC 4.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Unions 379 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 786 379 FTE
STATE-SIZE Radial 379 FTE
STATE-SIZE Howard Leisure Center 379 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago Public Schools 49,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago/Corporate 18,831 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Illinois at Chicago 13,092 FTE
CITY-NEAR University Health Service UIC UIC Campus 12,732 FTE
NAT-TCR Refrigeration Vessels and Systems Corporation 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR office 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Centra Hospice-Lynchburg 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Oak Steel 4.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lake Success 379 FTE
NAT-SIZE First Quality Baby Products 379 FTE
NAT-SIZE PCL Construction Services Inc. 379 FTE
NAT-SIZE Legacy Fruit Packers LLC 379 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.