Residential property managing · Minnesota

FirstService Residential Minnesota, Inc.

Bloomington, MN · ~569 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

FirstService Residential Minnesota, Inc. runs at 190% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Residential property managing workplace, earning a grade D.

FirstService Residential Minnesota, Inc.: 2.7 TCR = 190% of Residential property managing BLS 1.4 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

FirstService Residential Minnesota, Inc. safety composite

FirstService Residential Minnesota, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2017→2024

FirstService Residential Minnesota, Inc. injury rate improved

FirstService Residential Minnesota, Inc.'s TCR fell 0.6 from 3.0 in 2017 to 2.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.49× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.0 · 2024=2.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 531311 · Bloomington, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 2.7 · 190% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #10/26
  • PHOTO MCMC
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~569 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MCMC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

FirstService Residential Minnesota, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows FirstService Residential Minnesota, Inc. averages 2.7 TCR (190% of the Residential property managing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

FirstService Residential Minnesota, Inc. TCR series: 2017=3 · 2024=2.3 · BLS 1.4

Where FirstService Residential Minnesota, Inc. falls in its industry

500 Residential property managing establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 26 Residential property managing employers in Minnesota.

FirstService Residential Minnesota, Inc. (569 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate FirstService Residential Minnesota, Inc.
FirstService Residential Minnesota, Inc. (569 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 4.5

FirstService Residential Minnesota, Inc. has more employees than the Residential property managing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.3 1.3 9 0 0
2017 3.0 1.7 12 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

531311 · MN · Bloomington

500 Residential property managing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 306 employers in Bloomington, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MCMC 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hot Springs Village POA 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Laurus Home Care - Middletown 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vesta Property Services, Inc. 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Minnesota Historical Society 569 FTE
STATE-SIZE Transport Solutions Americas : MFG-Minneapolis, MN-USA 570 FTE
STATE-SIZE Endeavor Air, Inc. - MSP Flight Operations and Inflight Base 570 FTE
STATE-SIZE Health One Transportation (Allina Health Emergency Medical Services - St. Paul) 568 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0081 BLOOMINGTON 8170 BLDG 2,884 FTE
CITY-NEAR HP - 8170 2,277 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bloomington/Normandale 1,474 FTE
CITY-NEAR Donaldson Company Inc. 1,390 FTE
NAT-TCR Jet Provisions, Inc. 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Canfield Plumbing & Heating 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Red Star Yeast Company 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Great Lakes Cheese 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wallingford 569 FTE
NAT-SIZE Toray Plastics (America), Inc. 569 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cabinetworks Group 569 FTE
NAT-SIZE New York Independent System Operator, Inc. 569 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.