Electric power distribution systems · New York

New York Independent System Operator, Inc.

Rensselaer, NY · ~569 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.3
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

New York Independent System Operator, Inc. runs at 28% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Electric power distribution systems workplace, earning a grade A.

New York Independent System Operator, Inc.: 0.3 TCR = 28% of Electric power distribution systems BLS 1.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

New York Independent System Operator, Inc. safety composite

New York Independent System Operator, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 96% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 96% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.9

2018→2023

New York Independent System Operator, Inc. injury rate improved

New York Independent System Operator, Inc.'s TCR fell 0.9 from 0.9 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 0.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.9 · 2022=0.2 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Rensselaer, NY AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.3 · 28% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #9/110
  • PHOTO TEXOMA SVC CTR
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~569 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TEXOMA SVC CTR (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

New York Independent System Operator, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows New York Independent System Operator, Inc. averages 0.3 TCR (28% of the Electric power distribution systems BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

New York Independent System Operator, Inc. TCR series: 2018=0.9 · 2022=0.2 · 2023=0 · BLS 1.2

Where New York Independent System Operator, Inc. falls in its industry

2,958 Electric power distribution sy establishments

Safer than 96% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 110 Electric power distribution sy employers in New York.

New York Independent System Operator, Inc. (569 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate New York Independent System Operator, Inc.
New York Independent System Operator, Inc. (569 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

New York Independent System Operator, Inc. has more employees than the Electric power distribution systems median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.2 0.2 1 0 0
2018 0.9 0.3 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · NY · Rensselaer

2,958 Electric power distribution systems employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 34 employers in Rensselaer, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TEXOMA SVC CTR 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR West Conshohocken Gas Plant 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR ML3 Brevard Service Center 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR NV Energy-Beltway 0.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE SCI, LLC - East Fishkill 569 FTE
STATE-SIZE McKinley 569 FTE
STATE-SIZE CS Wholesale Grocers : Chester, NY (PDC) 570 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4818-48180030-313 UNDERHILL BLVD-WC 568 FTE
CITY-NEAR Regeneron - Industrial Operations and Product Supply (IOPS) 3,669 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6458-ZALB 599 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1940 379 FTE
CITY-NEAR 122 299 FTE
NAT-TCR Thompson Surgical Instruments 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Charles R. Underwood, Inc. 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR PCL Construction Services Inc. 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Petaluma CA 0.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cabinetworks Group 569 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wallingford 569 FTE
NAT-SIZE Toray Plastics (America), Inc. 569 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1855-WIMIL90 569 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.