Motor vehicle metal parts stamping · Michigan

Fisher Dynamics - Troy

Troy, MI · ~128 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
5.8
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fisher Dynamics - Troy runs at 108% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Motor vehicle metal parts stamping workplace, earning a grade C.

Fisher Dynamics - Troy: 5.8 TCR = 108% of Motor vehicle metal parts stamping BLS 5.4 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fisher Dynamics - Troy safety composite

Fisher Dynamics - Troy scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.8

2016→2024

Fisher Dynamics - Troy injury rate improved

Fisher Dynamics - Troy's TCR fell 0.8 from 7.3 in 2016 to 6.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 8.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.83× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.3 · 2017=5.4 · 2018=4.7 · 2019=3.8 · 2020=5.9 · 2021=4.0 · 2022=6.2 · 2023=8.6 · 2024=6.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336370 · Troy, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 5.8 · 108% of ind

  • DART 4.8 DART
  • RANK #101/165
  • PHOTO Bailey Manufacturing…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 68 inj
  • SIZE ~128 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bailey Manufacturing Co., LLC. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Fisher Dynamics - Troy in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fisher Dynamics - Troy averages 5.8 TCR (108% of the Motor vehicle metal parts stamping BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fisher Dynamics - Troy TCR series: 2016=7.3 · 2017=5.4 · 2018=4.7 · 2019=3.8 · 2020=5.9 · 2021=4 · 2022=6.2 · 2023=8.6 · 2024=6.5 · BLS 5.4

Where Fisher Dynamics - Troy falls in its industry

510 Motor vehicle metal parts stam establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #101 safest of 165 Motor vehicle metal parts stam employers in Michigan.

Fisher Dynamics - Troy (128 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 145 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 024681012 Average employees Total Case Rate Fisher Dynamics - Troy
Fisher Dynamics - Troy (128 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 145 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Fisher Dynamics - Troy has fewer employees than the Motor vehicle metal parts stamping median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.5 4.8 3 1 0
2023 8.6 3.9 10 1 0
2022 6.2 4.5 11 0 0
2021 4.0 4.0 6 0 0
2020 5.9 3.3 8 1 0
2019 3.8 3.2 6 1 0
2018 4.7 4.7 8 0 0
2017 5.4 4.7 8 0 0
2016 7.3 5.5 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336370 · MI · Troy

510 Motor vehicle metal parts stamping employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 237 employers in Troy, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bailey Manufacturing Co., LLC. 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Global Advanced Products, LLC 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR GYT - Evergreen 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR TTD - Bennett 5.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Purpose Point Harvesting LLC 128 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lombardo Homes of SE Michigan 128 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Boldt Company - MI 128 FTE
STATE-SIZE Henkels & McCoy, Michigan - Gaylord 128 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2250-309 5,397 FTE
CITY-NEAR Henry Ford Troy - Maple Road 1,702 FTE
CITY-NEAR Headquarters 1,607 FTE
CITY-NEAR Troy - Maple Road 1,361 FTE
NAT-TCR Kings Island 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Soy Processing Plant Hastings 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR J.D'Annunzio & Sons Inc. 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 125 North Cape 5.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Henkels & McCoy, Illinois - Salem 128 FTE
NAT-SIZE Carlisle Karns Food Store 128 FTE
NAT-SIZE Welding Accessories and Cutting - Appleton 128 FTE
NAT-SIZE Convent Plant 128 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.