Soybean oil, cake, and meal, made in crushing mills · Nebraska

Soy Processing Plant Hastings

Hastings, NE · ~94 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Soy Processing Plant Hastings runs at 176% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Soybean oil, cake, and meal, made in crushing mills workplace, earning a grade D.

Soy Processing Plant Hastings: 5.8 TCR = 176% of Soybean oil, cake, and meal, made in crushing mills BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Soy Processing Plant Hastings safety composite

Soy Processing Plant Hastings scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2016→2024

Soy Processing Plant Hastings injury rate improved

Soy Processing Plant Hastings's TCR fell 0.7 from 4.7 in 2016 to 3.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 9.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.34× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.7 · 2017=4.3 · 2018=5.8 · 2019=4.7 · 2020=6.3 · 2021=5.6 · 2022=7.5 · 2023=9.4 · 2024=3.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311224 · Hastings, NE ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.8 · 176% of ind

  • DART 2.0 DART
  • RANK #8/8
  • PHOTO Delphos OH
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 53 inj
  • SIZE ~94 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Delphos OH (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nebraska employers → · Look up another →

Soy Processing Plant Hastings in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Soy Processing Plant Hastings averages 5.8 TCR (176% of the Soybean oil, cake, and meal, made in crushing mills BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Soy Processing Plant Hastings TCR series: 2016=4.7 · 2017=4.3 · 2018=5.8 · 2019=4.7 · 2020=6.3 · 2021=5.6 · 2022=7.5 · 2023=9.4 · 2024=3.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Soy Processing Plant Hastings falls in its industry

146 Soybean oil, cake, and meal, m establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Nebraska alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 8 Soybean oil, cake, and meal, m employers in Nebraska.

Soy Processing Plant Hastings (94 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Soy Processing Plant Hastings
Soy Processing Plant Hastings (94 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Soy Processing Plant Hastings has more employees than the Soybean oil, cake, and meal, made in cru median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.9 2.0 4 0 0
2023 9.4 9.4 10 0 0
2022 7.5 4.7 8 0 0
2021 5.6 3.8 6 0 0
2020 6.3 2.7 6 1 0
2019 4.7 4.7 5 0 0
2018 5.8 2.9 6 0 0
2017 4.3 3.2 4 0 0
2016 4.7 3.5 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311224 · NE · Hastings

146 Soybean oil, cake, and meal, made in crushing mills employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,594 rated employers in Nebraska with headcount on file · 65 employers in Hastings, NE · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Delphos OH 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR St Joe Soy 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Puris Dawson 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Agra Marketing Group 5.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Multi-Color Corporation - Omaha 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE Centennial Plastics 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE Deeter Foundry 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kinney Manufacturing (dba IntoMetal) 94 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mary Lanning Memorial Hospital 1,197 FTE
CITY-NEAR Transport Solutions Americas : MFG-Hastings, NE-USA 472 FTE
CITY-NEAR Transport Solutions NA and EMEA : MFG-Hastings, NE-USA 465 FTE
CITY-NEAR WR Reserve 381 FTE
NAT-TCR Jacksonville JAX 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Boston Marriott Burlington 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Blackhawk Moving & Storage 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Fisher Dynamics - Troy 5.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE ERCO Worldwide, USA - Port Edwards Plant 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE Newburg Location 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE Madison Concrete Construction - Corporate 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE L. C Doane Co 94 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.