Commercial printing (except screen, books) · Illinois

Fisher Printing

Bridgeview, IL · ~147 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fisher Printing runs at 59% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Commercial printing (except screen, books) workplace, earning a grade B.

Fisher Printing: 1.9 TCR = 59% of Commercial printing (except screen, books) BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fisher Printing safety composite

Fisher Printing scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.7

2018→2024

Fisher Printing injury rate improved

Fisher Printing's TCR fell 1.7 from 1.7 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=1.7 · 2019=2.4 · 2020=2.3 · 2021=2.2 · 2022=3.3 · 2023=1.8 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · Bridgeview, IL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 59% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #63/145
  • PHOTO Graphcom Gettysburg
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~147 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Graphcom Gettysburg (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Fisher Printing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fisher Printing averages 1.9 TCR (59% of the Commercial printing (except screen, books) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fisher Printing TCR series: 2018=1.7 · 2019=2.4 · 2020=2.3 · 2021=2.2 · 2022=3.3 · 2023=1.8 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Fisher Printing falls in its industry

2,001 Commercial printing (except sc establishments

Safer than 65% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #63 safest of 145 Commercial printing (except sc employers in Illinois.

Fisher Printing (147 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Fisher Printing
Fisher Printing (147 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Fisher Printing has more employees than the Commercial printing (except screen, book median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 1.8 1.8 2 0 0
2022 3.3 2.5 4 0 0
2021 2.2 2.2 3 0 0
2020 2.3 2.3 3 0 0
2019 2.4 2.4 4 0 0
2018 1.7 1.2 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · IL · Bridgeview

2,001 Commercial printing (except screen, books) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 65 employers in Bridgeview, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Graphcom Gettysburg 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vestcom International, Columbus OH 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Standard Press Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Xeikon (a subsidiary of Flint Group Packaging Ink North America Corp) 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE 74E - Eastern - IL Electric Ops 147 FTE
STATE-SIZE Feldco- DO 147 FTE
STATE-SIZE Judlau Contracting-Lisle, ILL - All Locations 147 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gallagher Asphalt Corporation 147 FTE
CITY-NEAR VCNA Prairie LLC 705 FTE
CITY-NEAR Foodservice : BRIDGEVIEW 576 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bridgeview 473 FTE
CITY-NEAR CC 300654 BRIDGEVIEW PLT 374 FTE
NAT-TCR Maricopa County - Adult Probation (110) 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Hercules Fence of Maryland LLC - Jessup 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR C&S Products Co. Inc. - North Plant 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Red Rooster Coffee Roaster 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE PCD 147 FTE
NAT-SIZE Moorhead Brothers Inc 147 FTE
NAT-SIZE Belmont Village Rancho Palos Verdes 147 FTE
NAT-SIZE Viking Cives USA 147 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.