Real estate property managers' offices, residential · California

Fite Properties Inc. DBA Fite Development Company

Sacramento, CA · ~22 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fite Properties Inc. DBA Fite Development Company runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Real estate property managers' offices, residential workplace, earning a grade C.

Fite Properties Inc. DBA Fite Development Company: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Real estate property managers' offices, residential BLS 1.4 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fite Properties Inc. DBA Fite Development Company safety composite

Fite Properties Inc. DBA Fite Development Company scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Fite Properties Inc. DBA Fite Development Company held a steady TCR band

Fite Properties Inc. DBA Fite Development Company's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 0.0 TCR.

2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 531311 · Sacramento, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/47
  • PHOTO Leland Management, I…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Leland Management, Inc. (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Fite Properties Inc. DBA Fite Development Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fite Properties Inc. DBA Fite Development Company averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Real estate property managers' offices, residential BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fite Properties Inc. DBA Fite Development Company TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 1.4

Where Fite Properties Inc. DBA Fite Development Company falls in its industry

500 Real estate property managers' establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 47 Real estate property managers' employers in California.

Fite Properties Inc. DBA Fite Development Company (22 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Fite Properties Inc. DBA Fite Development Company
Fite Properties Inc. DBA Fite Development Company (22 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Fite Properties Inc. DBA Fite Development Company has fewer employees than the Real estate property managers' offices, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

531311 · CA · Sacramento

500 Real estate property managers' offices, residential employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,348 employers in Sacramento, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Leland Management, Inc. 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR TF Cornerstone Inc. 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Corporate Chicago 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR GREP Atlanta (City Office) 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE LaGrande Farms 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Del Carlo Farms, Inc. 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Linda Vista Farms 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE MOUNTAIN VIEW FARM SHOP 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Davis Health 10,481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Employment Development Department 8,494 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 451 5,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 485 5,500 FTE
NAT-TCR Carbro Constructors Corp Main 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Keller Warehouse 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Airborn Inc. Addison 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Kinship Pointe Seward 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Everlan Hixson, LLC 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Atlantic Aviation - ILG 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Atlantic Aviation - MCO 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE King of Prussia - Plaza, Court and Pavilion 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.