Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) · Florida

Fl-Dst Acj-130

Hurlburt Field, FL · ~41 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fl-Dst Acj-130 runs at 23% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) workplace, earning a grade A.

Fl-Dst Acj-130: 1.0 TCR = 23% of Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS 4.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fl-Dst Acj-130 safety composite

Fl-Dst Acj-130 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Fl-Dst Acj-130: 0.0 → 1.7 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 2.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2022

Fl-Dst Acj-130's TCR rose 1.7 from 0.0 in 2018 to 1.7 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 2.4 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488190 · Hurlburt Field, FL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 23% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #27/137
  • PHOTO Lockheed Martin Corp…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lockheed Martin Corporation Langley Air Force Base (1205) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Fl-Dst Acj-130 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fl-Dst Acj-130 averages 1.0 TCR (23% of the Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fl-Dst Acj-130 TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=2.4 · 2020=0 · 2022=1.7 · BLS 4.5

Where Fl-Dst Acj-130 falls in its industry

992 Aircraft maintenance and repai establishments

Safer than 88% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #27 safest of 137 Aircraft maintenance and repai employers in Florida.

Fl-Dst Acj-130 (41 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Fl-Dst Acj-130
Fl-Dst Acj-130 (41 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Fl-Dst Acj-130 has fewer employees than the Aircraft maintenance and repair services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 1.7 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.4 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488190 · FL · Hurlburt Field

992 Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 8 employers in Hurlburt Field, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation Langley Air Force Base (1205) 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR S&K Engineering and Research, LLC 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR LJ WALCH CO INC 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR DI - Joint Base Andrews (Rotary Wing) 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Oceans, Reefs & Aquariums, LLC 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE CO1 Cocoa Service Center 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Odessa Transmission Operations 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eagle Trace 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Hurlburt Field FL-Bennett Ave (3826) 162 FTE
CITY-NEAR FL - Hurlburt - PC12 East 155 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Hurlburt Field Campus (1173) 105 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US FL Hurlburt Field Independe (1173) 64 FTE
NAT-TCR PSSI - 0552 OK Foods Inc. - Reed Lane 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR ISD 831 Forest Lake Schools Middle School 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 1438 - Southeast Huntsville 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Earle M Jorgensen-Kansas City 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE HG1054 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Talon Maritime, LLC 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE HG752 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE S.C. Dunn Drywalll 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.