Employer · Virginia

Lockheed Martin Corporation Langley Air Force Base (1205)

Langley Air Force Base, VA · ~56 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lockheed Martin Corporation Langley Air Force Base (1205) runs at 23% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical industry workplace, earning a grade A.

Lockheed Martin Corporation Langley Air Force Base (1205): 1.0 TCR = 23% of industry BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lockheed Martin Corporation Langley Air Force Base (1205) safety composite

Lockheed Martin Corporation Langley Air Force Base (1205) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Lockheed Martin Corporation Langley Air Force Base (1205): 0.0 → 1.9 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 3.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.93× in 2024

Lockheed Martin Corporation Langley Air Force Base (1205)'s TCR rose 1.9 from 0.0 in 2016 to 1.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.93× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488190 · Langley Air Force Base, VA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 23% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #7/33
  • PHOTO FL-DST ACJ-130
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~56 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: FL-DST ACJ-130 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Lockheed Martin Corporation Langley Air Force Base (1205) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lockheed Martin Corporation Langley Air Force Base (1205) averages 1.0 TCR (23% of the industry BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lockheed Martin Corporation Langley Air Force Base (1205) TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=1.9 · 2020=0 · 2022=3.2 · 2023=1.2 · 2024=1.9 · BLS 4.5

Where Lockheed Martin Corporation Langley Air Force Base (1205) falls in its industry

992 industry establishments

Safer than 88% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 33 industry employers in Virginia.

Lockheed Martin Corporation Langley Air Force Base (1205) (56 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Lockheed Martin Corporation Langley Air Force Base (1205)
Lockheed Martin Corporation Langley Air Force Base (1205) (56 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Lockheed Martin Corporation Langley Air Force Base (1205) has fewer employees than the industry median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.9 0.9 2 0 0
2023 1.2 1.2 1 0 0
2022 3.2 1.6 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488190 · VA · Langley Air Force Base

992 industry employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR FL-DST ACJ-130 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR S&K Engineering and Research, LLC 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR LJ WALCH CO INC 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR DI - Joint Base Andrews (Rotary Wing) 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE PACKING HOUSE 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE PORTSMOUTH DIST 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE 206-NiSource-Fredericksburg VA-Commerce 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Atlantic Contruction Utilities INC. 56 FTE
NAT-TCR Mt. Laurel 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Star-Lo Communications 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Linde - Medford (Electronics) 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Dassault Falcon Jet LIT 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE HEADB 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bil-Den Glass 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE XSY 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oakgrove Construction, Inc. 56 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.