Distribution of electric power · Arizona

Flagstaff Forestry/IS

Name: Flagstaff Forestry/IS Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Flagstaff, AZ · ~42 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

F
Failing Safety Record: 3.1
Avg TCR: 1.2
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Flagstaff Forestry/IS runs at 256% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade F.

Flagstaff Forestry/IS: 3.1 TCR = 256% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Flagstaff Forestry/IS safety composite

Flagstaff Forestry/IS scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): D 3.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers
DART rate: F 2.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.1

2016→2019

Flagstaff Forestry/IS injury rate improved

Flagstaff Forestry/IS's TCR fell 5.1 from 7.5 in 2016 to 2.4 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 7.5 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.79× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.5 · 2017=2.3 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=2.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Flagstaff, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 3.1 · 256% of ind

DART 2.4 DART
RANK #39/52
PHOTO Delafield
BOOK 4y book
INJ 5 inj
SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Delafield (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

This site

3.1
Delafield

3.1
Bowling Green

3.1
SFC System Fac

3.1
Central Distri

3.1

What this shows Flagstaff Forestry/IS averages 3.1 TCR (256% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Flagstaff Forestry/IS TCR series: 2016=7.5 · 2017=2.3 · 2018=0 · 2019=2.4 · BLS 1.2

Where Flagstaff Forestry/IS falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

Grade F

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #39 safest of 52 Distribution of electric power employers in Arizona.

Flagstaff Forestry/IS (42 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Flagstaff Forestry/IS has fewer employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries
2019	2.4	2.4	1
2018	0.0	0.0	0
2017	2.3	0.0	1
2016	7.5	5.0	3

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · AZ · Flagstaff

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 181 employers in Flagstaff, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Delafield	DELAFIELD, WI	3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Bowling Green	WOODFORD, VA	3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR	SFC System Facility Center	HAZLE TOWNSHIP, PA	3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Central District	CREWE, VA	3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Verano CPG Winslow	WINSLOW	42 FTE
STATE-SIZE	260_450	SOMERTON	42 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Flagstaff Maintenance North	FLAGSTAFF	42 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Apache Junction office	APACHE JUNCTION	42 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Northern Arizona University	Flagstaff	7,465 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Northern Arizona Healthcare	Flagstaff	4,087 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Coconino County Board of Supervisors	Flagstaff	1,102 FTE
CITY-NEAR	City of Flagstaff	Flagstaff	1,075 FTE
NAT-TCR	E.L.Harvey & Sons, Inc.	Westborough, MA	3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR	eutawville iga	Eutawville, SC	3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR	4769-442-Pottery Barn	Palm Desert, CA	3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR	4769-475-Pottery Barn	Rolling Hills Esta, CA	3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE	5 North 11th Street	Brooklyn, NY	42 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Bass Mechanical	Elizabethtown, PA	42 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Rcrs Oh Weber East Herrick	Wellington, OH	42 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Printing/Manufacturing II	Porterville, CA	42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.