Electric power distribution systems · Arizona

Flagstaff Maintenance North

Flagstaff, AZ · ~42 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Flagstaff Maintenance North runs at 104% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Electric power distribution systems workplace, earning a grade C.

Flagstaff Maintenance North: 1.3 TCR = 104% of Electric power distribution systems BLS 1.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Flagstaff Maintenance North safety composite

Flagstaff Maintenance North scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.9

2016→2022

Flagstaff Maintenance North injury rate improved

Flagstaff Maintenance North's TCR fell 4.9 from 5.1 in 2016 to 0.2 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2016 at 5.1 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.18× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.1 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=2.2 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2022=0.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Flagstaff, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 1.3 · 104% of ind

  • DART 0.2 DART
  • RANK #18/52
  • PHOTO BIG SPRING SVC
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: BIG SPRING SVC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Flagstaff Maintenance North in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Flagstaff Maintenance North averages 1.3 TCR (104% of the Electric power distribution systems BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Flagstaff Maintenance North TCR series: 2016=5.1 · 2017=0 · 2018=2.2 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2022=0.2 · BLS 1.2

Where Flagstaff Maintenance North falls in its industry

2,958 Electric power distribution sy establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 52 Electric power distribution sy employers in Arizona.

Flagstaff Maintenance North (42 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Flagstaff Maintenance North
Flagstaff Maintenance North (42 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Flagstaff Maintenance North has fewer employees than the Electric power distribution systems median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.2 0.2 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.2 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 5.1 2.6 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · AZ · Flagstaff

2,958 Electric power distribution systems employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 181 employers in Flagstaff, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR BIG SPRING SVC 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR BROCKTON - E ASHLAND ST BLDG-MA07 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR New Hebron 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Los Fresnos SC 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Verano CPG Winslow 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE 260_450 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Flagstaff Forestry/IS 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Apache Junction office 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northern Arizona University 7,465 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northern Arizona Healthcare 4,087 FTE
CITY-NEAR Coconino County Board of Supervisors 1,102 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Flagstaff 1,075 FTE
NAT-TCR North Babylon 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Witmer's Feed & Grain Inc 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR CIF (Fort Hood) 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR APMP 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rc - Harrisburg Pa 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE JMC Electrical Contractor LLC 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jet Intermodal, Inc. 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Papy's Foods, Inc. 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.