Heat treating metals and metal products for the trade · Minnesota

Flame Metals Processing Corporation

Rogers, MN · ~111 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Flame Metals Processing Corporation runs at 174% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Heat treating metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade D.

Flame Metals Processing Corporation: 5.7 TCR = 174% of Heat treating metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Flame Metals Processing Corporation safety composite

Flame Metals Processing Corporation scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.5

2017→2024

Flame Metals Processing Corporation injury rate improved

Flame Metals Processing Corporation's TCR fell 7.5 from 10.2 in 2017 to 2.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 11.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=10.2 · 2019=4.8 · 2021=11.0 · 2022=3.0 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=2.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332811 · Rogers, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.7 · 174% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/5
  • PHOTO metal improvement llc
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 39 inj
  • SIZE ~111 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: metal improvement llc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Flame Metals Processing Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Flame Metals Processing Corporation averages 5.7 TCR (174% of the Heat treating metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Flame Metals Processing Corporation TCR series: 2017=10.2 · 2019=4.8 · 2021=11 · 2022=3 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=2.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Flame Metals Processing Corporation falls in its industry

248 Heat treating metals and metal establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 5 Heat treating metals and metal employers in Minnesota.

Flame Metals Processing Corporation (111 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Flame Metals Processing Corporation
Flame Metals Processing Corporation (111 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Flame Metals Processing Corporation has more employees than the Heat treating metals and metal products median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.7 0.0 2 2 0
2023 2.7 2.0 3 1 0
2022 3.0 2.2 4 0 0
2021 11.0 7.3 13 2 0
2019 4.8 4.0 5 1 0
2017 10.2 7.3 12 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332811 · MN · Rogers

248 Heat treating metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 101 employers in Rogers, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR metal improvement llc 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wichita McLean 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heat Treating Services Plant 1 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Solar Atmospheres of California 5.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE East Side Jersey Dairy - Woodbury 111 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corporate 111 FTE
STATE-SIZE Co-operative Plating 111 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stylmark, Inc. 111 FTE
CITY-NEAR Graco Inc. - Koch Center 607 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6458-ZMPG 532 FTE
CITY-NEAR Reinhart - Rogers - 0557 487 FTE
CITY-NEAR Foodservice Twin Cities - 0557 482 FTE
NAT-TCR Chino Hills 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Leeland Baking Company, LLC 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Dbn Frame Plnt 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Dragon Rigs LTD, Odessa TX Facility 5.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Davis Development Inc 111 FTE
NAT-SIZE Beverly 111 FTE
NAT-SIZE el super #32 sierra 111 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lacombe Nursing Centre 111 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.