Hazardous waste treatment facilities combined with collection and/or local hauling of hazardous waste · New Jersey

Flanders

Flanders, NJ · ~111 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Flanders runs at 58% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Hazardous waste treatment facilities combined with collection and/or local hauling of hazardous waste workplace, earning a grade B.

Flanders: 1.5 TCR = 58% of Hazardous waste treatment facilities combined with collection and/or local hauling of hazardous waste BLS 2.6 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Flanders safety composite

Flanders scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.4

2016→2024

Flanders injury rate improved

Flanders's TCR fell 1.4 from 2.0 in 2016 to 0.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.0 · 2017=1.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=1.7 · 2020=3.0 · 2021=0.8 · 2022=3.1 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=0.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562211 · Flanders, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.5 · 58% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/9
  • PHOTO Safety Kleen Systems…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~111 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Safety Kleen Systems Inc 77SMR (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Flanders in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Flanders averages 1.5 TCR (58% of the Hazardous waste treatment facilities combined with collection and/or local hauling of hazardous waste BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Flanders TCR series: 2016=2 · 2017=1 · 2018=0 · 2019=1.7 · 2020=3 · 2021=0.8 · 2022=3.1 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=0.6 · BLS 2.6

Where Flanders falls in its industry

211 Hazardous waste treatment faci establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 9 Hazardous waste treatment faci employers in New Jersey.

Flanders (111 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 50 employees and a TCR of 1.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Flanders
Flanders (111 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 50 employees and a TCR of 1.8

Flanders has more employees than the Hazardous waste treatment facilities com median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.6 0.0 1 0 0
2023 1.4 0.0 2 0 0
2022 3.1 2.4 4 0 0
2021 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2020 3.0 2.0 3 0 0
2019 1.7 0.8 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 1.0 0.0 1 0 0
2016 2.0 1.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562211 · NJ · Flanders

211 Hazardous waste treatment facilities combined with collection and/or local hauling of hazardous waste employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 24 employers in Flanders, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Safety Kleen Systems Inc 77SMR 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tradebe Environmental Services 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pt Washington Park 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chase Environmental Group Corporate 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Short Hills 111 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schuetz Container Systems - North Branch NJ 111 FTE
STATE-SIZE All Empoyees Working in NJ 111 FTE
STATE-SIZE 0597 MANHEIM NY METRO SKYLINE 100 ROUTE 46 111 FTE
CITY-NEAR Flanders Site 753 FTE
CITY-NEAR Petillo Incorporated 300 FTE
CITY-NEAR Skoda Contracting Company 253 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3291 209 FTE
NAT-TCR Sedona AZ Home Center 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Bedford 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR USA Heat Treating, Inc. 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Havre 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Thogus Products Company 111 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trader Joe's 0142 LK Oswego 111 FTE
NAT-SIZE Autumn Care of Nash 111 FTE
NAT-SIZE Silgan Containers Menomonie 111 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.