Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · Tennessee

Fleet: LaVergne SDO

Lavergne, TN · ~43 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
5.7
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fleet: LaVergne SDO runs at 88% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade C.

Fleet: LaVergne SDO: 5.7 TCR = 88% of Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fleet: LaVergne SDO safety composite

Fleet: LaVergne SDO scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.5

2023→2024

Fleet: LaVergne SDO injury rate improved

Fleet: LaVergne SDO's TCR fell 11.5 from 11.5 in 2023 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 11.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=11.5 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Lavergne, TN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 5.7 · 88% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #106/211
  • PHOTO Elite Delivery Team
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Elite Delivery Team (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Fleet: LaVergne SDO in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fleet: LaVergne SDO averages 5.7 TCR (88% of the Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fleet: LaVergne SDO TCR series: 2023=11.5 · 2024=0 · BLS 6.5

Where Fleet: LaVergne SDO falls in its industry

6,679 Courier services (i.e., interc establishments

Safer than 70% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #106 safest of 211 Courier services (i.e., interc employers in Tennessee.

Fleet: LaVergne SDO (43 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Fleet: LaVergne SDO
Fleet: LaVergne SDO (43 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Fleet: LaVergne SDO has fewer employees than the Courier services (i.e., intercity networ median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 11.5 8.6 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · TN · Lavergne

6,679 Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 76 employers in Lavergne, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Elite Delivery Team 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Black Bear Transportation INC. 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR PAWLG - WILLOW GROVE 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR CALAK - LAKEPORT CENTER 5.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mountain Electric Coop 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Parent Company, Inc. 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE BluSky - Bartlett 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE American Constructors, Inc. 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lavergne (BAMG) 982 FTE
CITY-NEAR Star Transportation, Inc. 474 FTE
CITY-NEAR C113 LaVergne 411 FTE
CITY-NEAR Advance Auto Parts DC 42 344 FTE
NAT-TCR Legend Oaks New Braunfels 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Skokie Hospital 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Precision Stampings Solutions, Inc. 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Kempf King of Prussia 5.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Southeast Ops General 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cable Components Group 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Prairie Wood Products 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Allen Courtyard 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.