Trucking, general freight, long-distance, truckload (TL) · Indiana

Flex-N-Gate Logistics

Covington, IN · ~63 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Flex-N-Gate Logistics runs at 62% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Trucking, general freight, long-distance, truckload (TL) workplace, earning a grade B.

Flex-N-Gate Logistics: 2.8 TCR = 62% of Trucking, general freight, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Flex-N-Gate Logistics safety composite

Flex-N-Gate Logistics scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 66% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.0

2016→2023

Flex-N-Gate Logistics injury rate improved

Flex-N-Gate Logistics's TCR fell 8.0 from 8.9 in 2016 to 1.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 8.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.34× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.9 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=3.5 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=1.5 · 2021=1.1 · 2022=4.1 · 2023=1.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484121 · Covington, IN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.8 · 62% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #49/125
  • PHOTO PA-Mechanicsburg
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~63 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PA-Mechanicsburg (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Flex-N-Gate Logistics in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Flex-N-Gate Logistics averages 2.8 TCR (62% of the Trucking, general freight, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Flex-N-Gate Logistics TCR series: 2016=8.9 · 2017=0 · 2018=3.5 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=1.5 · 2021=1.1 · 2022=4.1 · 2023=1 · BLS 4.5

Where Flex-N-Gate Logistics falls in its industry

3,252 Trucking, general freight, lon establishments

Safer than 54% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #49 safest of 125 Trucking, general freight, lon employers in Indiana.

Flex-N-Gate Logistics (63 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Flex-N-Gate Logistics
Flex-N-Gate Logistics (63 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Flex-N-Gate Logistics has more employees than the Trucking, general freight, long-distance median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2022 4.1 2.0 4 0 0
2021 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2020 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2019 2.5 2.5 2 0 0
2018 3.5 3.5 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 8.9 8.9 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484121 · IN · Covington

3,252 Trucking, general freight, long-distance, truckload (TL) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 8 employers in Covington, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PA-Mechanicsburg 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR WM 6866 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR TN013 - TN-Nashville-Operating Center 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR ECM Transport-Columbus 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Total Seed Production 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Johnson County REMC 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Loren Wood Builders 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE RLTurner 63 FTE
CITY-NEAR Flex-N-Gate Covington 247 FTE
CITY-NEAR WATERS OF COVINGTON 101 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Waters of Covington, LLC 94 FTE
CITY-NEAR County Market #507 68 FTE
NAT-TCR Western Dairy Transport--Dalhart 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Thielsch Engineering HQ 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Alexander Hugh Brown 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Fremont Millwork Co. 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Boulder BD 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Pearland 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE MetroClean Express Route Svcs 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Roosevelt Island Associates 63 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.