Acoustics testing laboratories or services · Illinois

Flood Testing Laboratories, Inc.

Chicago, IL · ~47 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Flood Testing Laboratories, Inc. runs at 286% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Acoustics testing laboratories or services workplace, earning a grade F.

Flood Testing Laboratories, Inc.: 1.4 TCR = 286% of Acoustics testing laboratories or services BLS 0.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Flood Testing Laboratories, Inc. safety composite

Flood Testing Laboratories, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Flood Testing Laboratories, Inc.: 0.0 → 2.9 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 2.9 TCR · DART/TCR 2× in 2024

Flood Testing Laboratories, Inc.'s TCR rose 2.9 from 0.0 in 2019 to 2.9 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541380 · Chicago, IL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 1.4 · 286% of ind

  • DART 2.9 DART
  • RANK #3/4
  • PHOTO Environment Associat…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Environment Associates, inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Flood Testing Laboratories, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Flood Testing Laboratories, Inc. averages 1.4 TCR (286% of the Acoustics testing laboratories or services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Flood Testing Laboratories, Inc. TCR series: 2019=0 · 2024=2.9 · BLS 0.5

Where Flood Testing Laboratories, Inc. falls in its industry

232 Acoustics testing laboratories establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 4 Acoustics testing laboratories employers in Illinois.

Flood Testing Laboratories, Inc. (47 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 1.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Flood Testing Laboratories, Inc.
Flood Testing Laboratories, Inc. (47 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 1.0

Flood Testing Laboratories, Inc. has fewer employees than the Acoustics testing laboratories or servic median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541380 · IL · Chicago

232 Acoustics testing laboratories or services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 2,934 employers in Chicago, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Environment Associates, inc 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Transportation Research Center Inc. 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arizona Proving Grounds - Yucca 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR IIA Facility Services 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE 1987-Jerseyville, IL (Monsanto Co.) 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stonington, IL-Mfg 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Prairie Power, Inc. 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN ILLINOIS - Distribution Operating - Decatur 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago Public Schools 49,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago/Corporate 18,831 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Illinois at Chicago 13,092 FTE
CITY-NEAR University Health Service UIC UIC Campus 12,732 FTE
NAT-TCR Wells Printing Co., Inc 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Southern Site Contractors 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR NYU Grossman School of Medicine 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Nova Biomedical Waltham 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Consolidated Forest Products, LLC 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Boyd Station LLC 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Orlando Mrc 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rancho Markets #6 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.