Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) · Arizona

Florence Support

Florence, AZ · ~32 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.9
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Florence Support runs at 362% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) workplace, earning a grade F.

Florence Support: 10.9 TCR = 362% of Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) BLS 3.0 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Florence Support safety composite

Florence Support scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Florence Support: 5.9 → 6.7 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 18.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2021

Florence Support's TCR rose 0.8 from 5.9 in 2016 to 6.7 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 18.9 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 722310 · Florence, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.9 · 362% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #138/152
  • PHOTO GIANT ADMIN
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: GIANT ADMIN (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Florence Support in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Florence Support averages 10.9 TCR (362% of the Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Florence Support TCR series: 2016=5.9 · 2017=15.3 · 2018=14.4 · 2019=18.9 · 2020=4 · 2021=6.7 · BLS 3.0

Where Florence Support falls in its industry

6,952 Cafeteria food services contra establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #138 safest of 152 Cafeteria food services contra employers in Arizona.

Florence Support (32 employees, TCR 10.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Florence Support
Florence Support (32 employees, TCR 10.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Florence Support has fewer employees than the Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 6.7 0.0 1 0 0
2020 4.0 0.0 1 0 0
2019 18.9 6.3 6 0 0
2018 14.4 2.9 5 0 0
2017 15.3 2.6 6 0 0
2016 5.9 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

722310 · AZ · Florence

6,952 Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 45 employers in Florence, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR GIANT ADMIN 10.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR AAA STADIUM CLUB DIN 10.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Federal Contract Tinker Food Service 10.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT ALOHA SWAP MEET 10.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE FICO Headquarters 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Elgin Tree Farm, Inc. 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE PFYF FINISHER & TRANS-EST 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE ARIZONA FINISHER & TRANS-EST 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR AZ Corrections-Eyman 1,103 FTE
CITY-NEAR ASPC-Eyman 1,054 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eyman 1,020 FTE
CITY-NEAR CENTRAL ARIZONA FLORENCE CORRE 933 FTE
NAT-TCR 1221 - Pearland Tx Whse 10.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Colorow Care Center 10.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Homewood Suites & Hampton Inn Teaneck 10.9 TCR
NAT-TCR American Metals Supply Company, Inc. Hazelwood, Missouri 10.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Delta 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Skeet Club 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Corrosion 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chiquita Brands L.L.C 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.