Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · North Carolina

Brookdale Skeet Club

High Point, NC · ~32 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brookdale Skeet Club runs at 238% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Brookdale Skeet Club: 9.0 TCR = 238% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brookdale Skeet Club safety composite

Brookdale Skeet Club scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 67% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 9.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−12.8

2016→2021

Brookdale Skeet Club injury rate improved

Brookdale Skeet Club's TCR fell 12.8 from 13.1 in 2016 to 0.2 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 15.5 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.02× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=13.1 · 2017=12.1 · 2018=4.7 · 2019=8.7 · 2020=15.5 · 2021=0.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · High Point, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.0 · 238% of ind

  • DART 0.2 DART
  • RANK #267/356
  • PHOTO Sycamore Trace
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sycamore Trace (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Brookdale Skeet Club in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brookdale Skeet Club averages 9.0 TCR (238% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brookdale Skeet Club TCR series: 2016=13.1 · 2017=12.1 · 2018=4.7 · 2019=8.7 · 2020=15.5 · 2021=0.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Brookdale Skeet Club falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #267 safest of 356 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in North Carolina.

Brookdale Skeet Club (32 employees, TCR 9.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Brookdale Skeet Club
Brookdale Skeet Club (32 employees, TCR 9.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Brookdale Skeet Club has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.2 0.2 5 0 0
2020 15.5 7.7 2 2 0
2019 8.7 0.0 2 0 0
2018 4.7 4.7 1 0 0
2017 12.1 4.0 3 0 0
2016 13.1 8.7 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NC · High Point

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 243 employers in High Point, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sycamore Trace 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Englewood 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cappella of Grand Junction 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Comfort Keepers 9.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE T.C. Smith Produce Farm 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE LATHAMS NURSERY INC. - MONROE, NC 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lake Wendell Farming Co. LLC 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Case Farms Goldsboro Hatchery 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR WFBMC - High Point Medical Center 1,936 FTE
CITY-NEAR CITY OF HIGH POINT 1,532 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thomas Built Buses 1,467 FTE
CITY-NEAR High Point Medical Center 1,370 FTE
NAT-TCR ViaQuest Residential Services - Dayton 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 4598-Rtc Flagstaff 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Champion Topeka 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR The Orchard 9.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Corrosion 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Florence Support 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Delta 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rinchem Company, Inc., CSC 14 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.