Janitorial services · Florida

Florida Cleaning Systems dba FCS Facility Svcs

Altamonte Springs, FL · ~154 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.1
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Florida Cleaning Systems dba FCS Facility Svcs runs at 91% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Janitorial services workplace, earning a grade C.

Florida Cleaning Systems dba FCS Facility Svcs: 4.1 TCR = 91% of Janitorial services BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Florida Cleaning Systems dba FCS Facility Svcs safety composite

Florida Cleaning Systems dba FCS Facility Svcs scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2017→2019

Florida Cleaning Systems dba FCS Facility Svcs injury rate improved

Florida Cleaning Systems dba FCS Facility Svcs's TCR fell 0.6 from 4.6 in 2017 to 4.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 4.6 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.59× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.6 · 2018=3.7 · 2019=4.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · Altamonte Springs, FL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 4.1 · 91% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #169/292
  • PHOTO GA
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~154 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: GA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Florida Cleaning Systems dba FCS Facility Svcs in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Florida Cleaning Systems dba FCS Facility Svcs averages 4.1 TCR (91% of the Janitorial services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Florida Cleaning Systems dba FCS Facility Svcs TCR series: 2017=4.6 · 2018=3.7 · 2019=4 · BLS 4.5

Where Florida Cleaning Systems dba FCS Facility Svcs falls in its industry

4,064 Janitorial services establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #169 safest of 292 Janitorial services employers in Florida.

Florida Cleaning Systems dba FCS Facility Svcs (154 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Florida Cleaning Systems dba FCS Facility Svcs
Florida Cleaning Systems dba FCS Facility Svcs (154 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Florida Cleaning Systems dba FCS Facility Svcs has more employees than the Janitorial services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 4.0 2.4 5 0 0
2018 3.7 1.2 3 0 0
2017 4.6 0.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · FL · Altamonte Springs

4,064 Janitorial services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 94 employers in Altamonte Springs, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR GA 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT MANORCARE CHAMBERSBURG 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL-ES 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR State Street 5257 4.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Farm 154 FTE
STATE-SIZE Packinghouse 154 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rodmark Construction 154 FTE
STATE-SIZE Concrete Proection and Restoration, LLC 154 FTE
CITY-NEAR AdventHealth Altamonte Springs 2,201 FTE
CITY-NEAR Florida Hospital Altamonte 2,195 FTE
CITY-NEAR Adventist Health System Corporate Headquarters 988 FTE
CITY-NEAR AHS Corporate AIT Solutions Building 962 FTE
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Aa Admirals Club Phx - a 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 216 / 217 Waukesha Pearce Industries Oklahoma City, OK 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Atlanta (HR) 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR State Street 5257 4.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Chicago Trolley & Double Decker Company 154 FTE
NAT-SIZE Henderson Health Care Services 154 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amick Farms, LLC Hatchery/FeedMill 154 FTE
NAT-SIZE SwedishAmerican Health System-Camelot 154 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.