Gynecologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) · Illinois

SwedishAmerican Health System-Camelot

Rockford, IL · ~154 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

SwedishAmerican Health System-Camelot runs at 40% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Gynecologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) workplace, earning a grade A.

SwedishAmerican Health System-Camelot: 1.5 TCR = 40% of Gynecologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

SwedishAmerican Health System-Camelot safety composite

SwedishAmerican Health System-Camelot scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

SwedishAmerican Health System-Camelot: 1.4 → 3.9 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 3.9 TCR · DART/TCR 2.07× in 2019

SwedishAmerican Health System-Camelot's TCR rose 2.5 from 1.4 in 2016 to 3.9 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 2.07× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621111 · Rockford, IL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.5 · 40% of ind

  • DART 3.1 DART
  • RANK #16/86
  • PHOTO Sutter County Jail
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~154 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sutter County Jail (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

SwedishAmerican Health System-Camelot in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows SwedishAmerican Health System-Camelot averages 1.5 TCR (40% of the Gynecologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

SwedishAmerican Health System-Camelot TCR series: 2016=1.4 · 2017=0.7 · 2018=0 · 2019=3.9 · BLS 3.8

Where SwedishAmerican Health System-Camelot falls in its industry

2,836 Gynecologists' offices (e.g., establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 86 Gynecologists' offices (e.g., employers in Illinois.

SwedishAmerican Health System-Camelot (154 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate SwedishAmerican Health System-Camelot
SwedishAmerican Health System-Camelot (154 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1

SwedishAmerican Health System-Camelot has more employees than the Gynecologists' offices (e.g., centers, c median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 3.9 3.1 5 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.7 0.0 0 1 0
2016 1.4 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621111 · IL · Rockford

2,836 Gynecologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 405 employers in Rockford, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sutter County Jail 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kentucky Ear, Nose and Throat Nicholasville Rd 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR PN1D ST LOUIS PK SPECIALTY CTR 3931 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Norfolk City Jail 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE 118 - South Capitol Bridge Builders 154 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harold O'shea Builders 154 FTE
STATE-SIZE Peoria Corn Plant 154 FTE
STATE-SIZE DuPont Gibson City 154 FTE
CITY-NEAR ILRKF - ROCKFORD AIR HUB 2,634 FTE
CITY-NEAR Swedish American Hospital - 4800 2,629 FTE
CITY-NEAR PCI Pharma Services Rockford 2,175 FTE
CITY-NEAR SwedishAmerican Hospital 1,855 FTE
NAT-TCR AL217 Alabama River Cellulose 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Lhp Bay Food 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Interface Services Acworth 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : SVC-Carolina District : SVC-CharlestonSC-USA 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Merwick Care and Rehabilitation Center 154 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amick Farms, LLC Hatchery/FeedMill 154 FTE
NAT-SIZE Henderson Health Care Services 154 FTE
NAT-SIZE Van Nuys District HDQ 154 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.