Sugar, cane, manufacturing · Florida

Florida Crystals Food Corporation

South Bay, FL · ~226 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
5.0
Avg TCR
4.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Florida Crystals Food Corporation runs at 120% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Sugar, cane, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Florida Crystals Food Corporation: 5.0 TCR = 120% of Sugar, cane, manufacturing BLS 4.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Florida Crystals Food Corporation safety composite

Florida Crystals Food Corporation scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 56% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
C 0

Safer than 56% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.3

2016→2024

Florida Crystals Food Corporation injury rate improved

Florida Crystals Food Corporation's TCR fell 1.3 from 5.3 in 2016 to 4.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 8.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.63× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.3 · 2017=3.6 · 2018=2.1 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=7.1 · 2022=8.5 · 2023=6.9 · 2024=4.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311314 · South Bay, FL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 5.0 · 120% of ind

  • DART 3.2 DART
  • RANK #3/5
  • PHOTO Okeelanta Corporation
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 93 inj
  • SIZE ~226 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Okeelanta Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Florida Crystals Food Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Florida Crystals Food Corporation averages 5.0 TCR (120% of the Sugar, cane, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Florida Crystals Food Corporation TCR series: 2016=5.3 · 2017=3.6 · 2018=2.1 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=7.1 · 2022=8.5 · 2023=6.9 · 2024=4 · BLS 4.2

Where Florida Crystals Food Corporation falls in its industry

57 Sugar, cane, manufacturing establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 5 Sugar, cane, manufacturing employers in Florida.

Florida Crystals Food Corporation (226 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 161 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Florida Crystals Food Corporation
Florida Crystals Food Corporation (226 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 161 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Florida Crystals Food Corporation has more employees than the Sugar, cane, manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.0 3.2 10 0 0
2023 6.9 6.9 18 0 0
2022 8.5 8.1 19 1 0
2020 7.1 4.9 13 3 0
2019 2.8 2.4 7 0 0
2018 2.1 1.6 4 0 0
2017 3.6 1.6 9 0 0
2016 5.3 4.8 13 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311314 · FL · South Bay

57 Sugar, cane, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 9 employers in South Bay, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Okeelanta Corporation 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Adams & Brooks Inc. 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lafourche Sugars LLC 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pullman Sugar LLC 4.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Electric Services, Inc. 226 FTE
STATE-SIZE COMANCO 226 FTE
STATE-SIZE Flowers Baking Co. of Miami 226 FTE
STATE-SIZE Maxwelll House Jacksonville Florida 226 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4238-118 388 FTE
CITY-NEAR 118 951 - GEO EASTERN REGIONAL OFFICE-SOUTH BAY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY 303 FTE
CITY-NEAR Donald Moss Corp. 71 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phillips and Jordan, Incorporated - CEPP Contract 10A 60 FTE
NAT-TCR BWL 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR LP Bremen, LLC 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 700 Cooper 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Wall New Jersey 5.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Oxford Nursing Home 226 FTE
NAT-SIZE Madisonville 226 FTE
NAT-SIZE Petco DC8198 226 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plastipak- Medina 226 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.