Flood control project construction · Florida

Phillips and Jordan, Incorporated - CEPP Contract 10A

South Bay, FL · ~60 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Phillips and Jordan, Incorporated - CEPP Contract 10A runs at 16% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Flood control project construction workplace, earning a grade A.

Phillips and Jordan, Incorporated - CEPP Contract 10A: 0.5 TCR = 16% of Flood control project construction BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Phillips and Jordan, Incorporated - CEPP Contract 10A safety composite

Phillips and Jordan, Incorporated - CEPP Contract 10A scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Phillips and Jordan, Incorporated - CEPP Contract 10A: 0.0 → 0.9 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 0.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Phillips and Jordan, Incorporated - CEPP Contract 10A's TCR rose 0.9 from 0.0 in 2023 to 0.9 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237990 · South Bay, FL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 16% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/60
  • PHOTO Perras Excavating, I…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~60 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Perras Excavating, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Phillips and Jordan, Incorporated - CEPP Contract 10A in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Phillips and Jordan, Incorporated - CEPP Contract 10A averages 0.5 TCR (16% of the Flood control project construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Phillips and Jordan, Incorporated - CEPP Contract 10A TCR series: 2023=0 · 2024=0.9 · BLS 2.8

Where Phillips and Jordan, Incorporated - CEPP Contract 10A falls in its industry

932 Flood control project construc establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 60 Flood control project construc employers in Florida.

Phillips and Jordan, Incorporated - CEPP Contract 10A (60 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Phillips and Jordan, Incorporated - CEPP Contract 10A
Phillips and Jordan, Incorporated - CEPP Contract 10A (60 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Phillips and Jordan, Incorporated - CEPP Contract 10A has fewer employees than the Flood control project construction median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.9 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237990 · FL · South Bay

932 Flood control project construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 9 employers in South Bay, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Perras Excavating, Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rice Lake West 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 104504 - INL Navy SFHP Structural Erection 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Shell Chemical LP Geismar LA 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bartow Combined Cycle Plant 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE PCC-Cape Canaveral Plant 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE BB1 Boynton Beach - S C Strm 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southern Customer Service 60 FTE
CITY-NEAR Okeelanta Corporation 1,315 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4238-118 388 FTE
CITY-NEAR 118 951 - GEO EASTERN REGIONAL OFFICE-SOUTH BAY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY 303 FTE
CITY-NEAR Florida Crystals Food Corporation 226 FTE
NAT-TCR MD - Hagerstown 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 050 Lackland 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Varick Street 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR LRS Healthcare, LLC 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE STR0514 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE CA-Lugo Substation 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Montebello on Academy FSQ Inc 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE 327 Laurel Ridge Center 60 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.