Electronic control installation and service · Arizona

Fluoresco Services Phoenix Branch

Phoenix, AZ · ~82 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fluoresco Services Phoenix Branch runs at 71% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Electronic control installation and service workplace, earning a grade B.

Fluoresco Services Phoenix Branch: 2.0 TCR = 71% of Electronic control installation and service BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fluoresco Services Phoenix Branch safety composite

Fluoresco Services Phoenix Branch scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.0

2016→2022

Fluoresco Services Phoenix Branch injury rate improved

Fluoresco Services Phoenix Branch's TCR fell 2.0 from 2.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 5.0 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.0 · 2017=2.1 · 2018=1.5 · 2019=5.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=3.4 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238210 · Phoenix, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 71% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #53/105
  • PHOTO TECH ANNEX
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~82 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TECH ANNEX (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Fluoresco Services Phoenix Branch in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fluoresco Services Phoenix Branch averages 2.0 TCR (71% of the Electronic control installation and service BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fluoresco Services Phoenix Branch TCR series: 2016=2 · 2017=2.1 · 2018=1.5 · 2019=5 · 2020=0 · 2021=3.4 · 2022=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Fluoresco Services Phoenix Branch falls in its industry

4,550 Electronic control installatio establishments

Safer than 58% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #53 safest of 105 Electronic control installatio employers in Arizona.

Fluoresco Services Phoenix Branch (82 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Fluoresco Services Phoenix Branch
Fluoresco Services Phoenix Branch (82 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Fluoresco Services Phoenix Branch has more employees than the Electronic control installation and serv median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 3.4 1.7 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 5.0 0.0 3 0 0
2018 1.5 0.0 1 0 0
2017 2.1 1.6 4 0 0
2016 2.0 2.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238210 · AZ · Phoenix

4,550 Electronic control installation and service employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 2,630 employers in Phoenix, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TECH ANNEX 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Einheit Electric Construction Co. 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Abbott Electric 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Moses Electric, Inc. - Gulfport 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Santa Cruz Farm 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE Electric Utility 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE CAZ-Pinnacle Peak Operations 0042-FAC52 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE PINNACLE PEAK OPS CNTR 0042-FAC52 82 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maricopa County 15,504 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phoenix Children's Hospital 7,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR All Company 6,261 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030500 6,153 FTE
NAT-TCR 4028-ARW13 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR USA Milwaukee 5300 S Howell Ave 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Harmon Westwood 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Bed Bath and Beyond Flint 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE DBK Inc 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Knapheide Truck Equipment 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Benchmark-Indy 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Benchmark Santa Fe NM 82 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.