Polystyrene Foam Manufacturing · California

Food Packaging : FRESNO

Name: Food Packaging : FRESNO Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Fresno, CA · ~139 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

A
Excellent Safety Record: 1.1
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Food Packaging : FRESNO runs at 33% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Polystyrene Foam Manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Food Packaging : FRESNO: 1.1 TCR = 33% of Polystyrene Foam Manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Food Packaging : FRESNO safety composite

Food Packaging : FRESNO scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): B 1.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers
DART rate: D 1.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Food Packaging : FRESNO: 0.0 → 1.6 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 1.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.44× in 2020

Food Packaging : FRESNO's TCR rose 1.6 from 0.0 in 2017 to 1.6 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 1.9 TCR. In 2020, DART was 1.44× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326140 · Fresno, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 33% of ind

DART 1.6 DART
RANK #3/14
PHOTO EFP La Vergne
BOOK 4y book
INJ 5 inj
SIZE ~139 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: EFP La Vergne (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Cellofoam-Gain

1.2
This site

1.1
EFP La Vergne

1.1
Alleguard - La

1
Huntington Sol

1

What this shows Food Packaging : FRESNO averages 1.1 TCR (33% of the Polystyrene Foam Manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Food Packaging : FRESNO TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0.9 · 2019=1.9 · 2020=1.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Food Packaging : FRESNO falls in its industry

260 Polystyrene Foam Manufacturing establishments

Safer than 88% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

Grade A

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 14 Polystyrene Foam Manufacturing employers in California.

Food Packaging : FRESNO (139 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Food Packaging : FRESNO has more employees than the Polystyrene Foam Manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries
2020	1.6	1.6	2
2019	1.9	1.9	2
2018	0.9	0.9	1
2017	0.0	0.0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326140 · CA · Fresno

260 Polystyrene Foam Manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 981 employers in Fresno, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	EFP La Vergne	LA VERGNE, TN	1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Cellofoam-Gainesville, GA	GAINESVILLE, GA	1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Alleguard - Lancaster	LANCASTER, OH	1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Huntington Solutions	RADFORD, VA	1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE	PV Farming Operations, LLC	WATSONVILLE	139 FTE
STATE-SIZE	SVL - 01	SUSANVILLE	139 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Alexander Labor Inc	OXNARD	139 FTE
STATE-SIZE	CA-Antelope Valley S/C	LANCASTER	139 FTE
CITY-NEAR	County of Fresno	Fresno	7,553 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Ag Force LLC	Fresno	6,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Community Regional Medical Ctr	Fresno	5,549 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Community Regional Medical Center	Fresno	4,921 FTE
NAT-TCR	Hft #1	Wynne, AR	1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR	Cargill Animal Nutrition	Kissimmee, FL	1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR	RealtyCarr	Carrollton, TX	1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR	Clean Harbors El Dorado	El Dorado, AR	1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE	2 Saw Mill River Rd	Hawthorne, NY	139 FTE
NAT-SIZE	McNeely Pest Control	Winston-Salem, NC	139 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Corporate Office	Rolling Meadows, IL	139 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Aid to Hospitals, Inc.	Rochester, NY	139 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.