Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Foothill Village Senior Living Community

Angels Camp, CA · ~44 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Foothill Village Senior Living Community runs at 205% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Foothill Village Senior Living Community: 7.8 TCR = 205% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Foothill Village Senior Living Community safety composite

Foothill Village Senior Living Community scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 61% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 46%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.2

2019→2021

Foothill Village Senior Living Community injury rate improved

Foothill Village Senior Living Community's TCR fell 5.2 from 12.9 in 2019 to 7.7 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 12.9 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.25× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=12.9 · 2020=2.8 · 2021=7.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Angels Camp, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.8 · 205% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #230/635
  • PHOTO Homeplace of Mondovi…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Homeplace of Mondovi, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Foothill Village Senior Living Community in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Foothill Village Senior Living Community averages 7.8 TCR (205% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Foothill Village Senior Living Community TCR series: 2019=12.9 · 2020=2.8 · 2021=7.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Foothill Village Senior Living Community falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 46% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #230 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Foothill Village Senior Living Community (44 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Foothill Village Senior Living Community
Foothill Village Senior Living Community (44 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Foothill Village Senior Living Community has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 7.7 1.9 1 3 0
2020 2.8 2.8 1 0 0
2019 12.9 10.3 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Angels Camp

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 10 employers in Angels Camp, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Homeplace of Mondovi, LLC 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oakmont of Simi Valley 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 63165 SUNRISE OF WOODCLIFF LAKE 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heartis Fayetteville 7.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Firebaugh 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Boutonnet Farms 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Central Coast Vineyards 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE FESTIVAL FARMS 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR CAANG - ANGELS CAMP 116 FTE
CITY-NEAR ANGELS CAMP (CAANG) 87 FTE
CITY-NEAR ANGELS CAMP SERVICE CENTER 80 FTE
CITY-NEAR Angels Camp 65 FTE
NAT-TCR Heartis Fayetteville 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Able Manufacturing & Assembly 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Hobart & William Smith Col-Caf 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Willow Gardens Care Center 7.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rinker BWICP 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE HORL 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rinchem Company, Inc., CSC 16 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stone Truck Parts -Garner 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.