Food Service Contractors · New York

Sodexo at Hobart & William Smith Col-Caf

Geneva, NY · ~23 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.8
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sodexo at Hobart & William Smith Col-Caf runs at 260% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Food Service Contractors workplace, earning a grade F.

Sodexo at Hobart & William Smith Col-Caf: 7.8 TCR = 260% of Food Service Contractors BLS 3.0 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sodexo at Hobart & William Smith Col-Caf safety composite

Sodexo at Hobart & William Smith Col-Caf scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.2

2017→2021

Sodexo at Hobart & William Smith Col-Caf injury rate improved

Sodexo at Hobart & William Smith Col-Caf's TCR fell 10.2 from 10.2 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 21.0 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=10.2 · 2018=21.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 722310 · Geneva, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.8 · 260% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #472/524
  • PHOTO SODEXO AT ASBURY PARK
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SODEXO AT ASBURY PARK (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Sodexo at Hobart & William Smith Col-Caf in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sodexo at Hobart & William Smith Col-Caf averages 7.8 TCR (260% of the Food Service Contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sodexo at Hobart & William Smith Col-Caf TCR series: 2017=10.2 · 2018=21 · 2019=0 · 2021=0 · BLS 3.0

Where Sodexo at Hobart & William Smith Col-Caf falls in its industry

6,952 Food Service Contractors establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #472 safest of 524 Food Service Contractors employers in New York.

Sodexo at Hobart & William Smith Col-Caf (23 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sodexo at Hobart & William Smith Col-Caf
Sodexo at Hobart & William Smith Col-Caf (23 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Sodexo at Hobart & William Smith Col-Caf has fewer employees than the Food Service Contractors median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 21.0 10.5 2 0 0
2017 10.2 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

722310 · NY · Geneva

6,952 Food Service Contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 49 employers in Geneva, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT ASBURY PARK 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lutheran Life - Pleasant View 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 500164900 UNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR REVEL - PROVINCE SPRINGS 7.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Singer Farms LLC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sheland Farms LLC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE McKnight's River Breeze Farm, LLC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stein Farms LLC 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hobart and William Smith Colleges 2,005 FTE
CITY-NEAR Geneva General Hospital 798 FTE
CITY-NEAR Zotos International Inc. 603 FTE
CITY-NEAR Henkel US Operations Corporation 411 FTE
NAT-TCR Willow Gardens Care Center 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Foothill Village Senior Living Community 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Heartis Fayetteville 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Able Manufacturing & Assembly 7.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Manorcare Kingston Court 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Manorcare Roland Park 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Manorcare Jersey Shore 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Manorcare Yardley 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.