Drives, high-speed industrial (except hydrostatic), manufacturing · Ohio

Force Control Industries

Fairfield, OH · ~39 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Force Control Industries runs at 10% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Drives, high-speed industrial (except hydrostatic), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Force Control Industries: 0.3 TCR = 10% of Drives, high-speed industrial (except hydrostatic), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Force Control Industries safety composite

Force Control Industries scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 96% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 96% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Force Control Industries held a steady TCR band

Force Control Industries's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 2.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=2.7 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333612 · Fairfield, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.3 · 10% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/10
  • PHOTO WITTENSTEIN
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: WITTENSTEIN (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Force Control Industries in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Force Control Industries averages 0.3 TCR (10% of the Drives, high-speed industrial (except hydrostatic), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Force Control Industries TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=2.7 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Force Control Industries falls in its industry

106 Drives, high-speed industrial establishments

Safer than 96% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 10 Drives, high-speed industrial employers in Ohio.

Force Control Industries (39 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Force Control Industries
Force Control Industries (39 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Force Control Industries has fewer employees than the Drives, high-speed industrial (except hy median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333612 · OH · Fairfield

106 Drives, high-speed industrial (except hydrostatic), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 148 employers in Fairfield, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR WITTENSTEIN 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Quad Plus LLC 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR SOLAR TURBINES INC. (Superior Gear) 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Intra Aerospace 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE DRW PACKING INC 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE OHI Greenhouse LLC 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bridgewater Dairy LLC 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rossburg Facility 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Health Fairfield Hospital 1,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fairfield Hospital 1,513 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Hospital Fairfield 1,494 FTE
CITY-NEAR Koch Foods 1,275 FTE
NAT-TCR Westminster Tool Inc 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Mcmeekin Steam Plant 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR EKC Technology, Inc 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR TKDA 0.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sauk Centre Store 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shawmut Metal Products, Inc. 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE J. De Sigio Construction, Inc. 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.