Building framing (except structural steel) · Wisconsin

Forest Construction Company, Inc.

Luxemburg, WI · ~36 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.2
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Forest Construction Company, Inc. runs at 256% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Building framing (except structural steel) workplace, earning a grade F.

Forest Construction Company, Inc.: 7.2 TCR = 256% of Building framing (except structural steel) BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Forest Construction Company, Inc. safety composite

Forest Construction Company, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Forest Construction Company, Inc.: 9.5 → 10.3 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 10.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.44× in 2024

Forest Construction Company, Inc.'s TCR rose 0.8 from 9.5 in 2016 to 10.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 10.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.44× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238130 · Luxemburg, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.2 · 256% of ind

  • DART 10.3 DART
  • RANK #9/18
  • PHOTO Madera Framing, Inc
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Madera Framing, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Forest Construction Company, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Forest Construction Company, Inc. averages 7.2 TCR (256% of the Building framing (except structural steel) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Forest Construction Company, Inc. TCR series: 2016=9.5 · 2017=10.8 · 2019=0 · 2020=4.8 · 2022=10.9 · 2023=3.7 · 2024=10.3 · BLS 2.8

Where Forest Construction Company, Inc. falls in its industry

387 Building framing (except struc establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 18 Building framing (except struc employers in Wisconsin.

Forest Construction Company, Inc. (36 employees, TCR 7.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Forest Construction Company, Inc.
Forest Construction Company, Inc. (36 employees, TCR 7.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.6

Forest Construction Company, Inc. has fewer employees than the Building framing (except structural stee median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 10.3 10.3 2 0 0
2023 3.7 3.7 1 0 0
2022 10.9 2.7 4 0 0
2020 4.8 2.4 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 10.8 4.3 5 0 0
2016 9.5 4.8 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238130 · WI · Luxemburg

387 Building framing (except structural steel) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 12 employers in Luxemburg, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Madera Framing, Inc 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Longwood FS (SSS,SAT) 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pompano Field 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Woodridge Framing, LLC 7.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Rolling Hills Diary Farm, LLC 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE T & T Quality Cutting LLC 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wisconsin Valley Improvement Company 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Barron Electric Cooperative 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR Agropur - Luxemburg 163 FTE
CITY-NEAR D & S Machine Service, Inc. 157 FTE
CITY-NEAR N.E.W. Plastics Corp 140 FTE
CITY-NEAR Van's Lumber & Custom Builders INc. 64 FTE
NAT-TCR Phil Etienne'S Timber Harvest,Inc. 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Marquette Mi - 3510 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Southern Minnesota Beet Sugar Cooperative 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Brainerd 7.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Holiday Trucking LLC 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE South Woods by New Perspective 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chateau At Sharmar Village 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Phoenix West Avondale Courtyard 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.