Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Colorado

Chateau At Sharmar Village

Pueblo, CO · ~36 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Chateau At Sharmar Village runs at 283% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Chateau At Sharmar Village: 10.7 TCR = 283% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Chateau At Sharmar Village safety composite

Chateau At Sharmar Village scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.3

2018→2024

Chateau At Sharmar Village injury rate improved

Chateau At Sharmar Village's TCR fell 6.3 from 13.0 in 2018 to 6.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 21.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.62× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=13.0 · 2019=21.1 · 2021=10.0 · 2022=10.4 · 2023=3.4 · 2024=6.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Pueblo, CO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.7 · 283% of ind

  • DART 6.7 DART
  • RANK #52/75
  • PHOTO Regency Senior Commu…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Regency Senior Communities Brookfield (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Chateau At Sharmar Village in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Chateau At Sharmar Village averages 10.7 TCR (283% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Chateau At Sharmar Village TCR series: 2018=13 · 2019=21.1 · 2021=10 · 2022=10.4 · 2023=3.4 · 2024=6.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Chateau At Sharmar Village falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 26% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #52 safest of 75 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Colorado.

Chateau At Sharmar Village (36 employees, TCR 10.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Chateau At Sharmar Village
Chateau At Sharmar Village (36 employees, TCR 10.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Chateau At Sharmar Village has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.7 6.7 2 0 0
2023 3.4 0.0 1 0 0
2022 10.4 10.4 3 0 0
2021 10.0 6.7 3 0 0
2019 21.1 21.1 6 0 0
2018 13.0 13.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · CO · Pueblo

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 209 employers in Pueblo, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Regency Senior Communities Brookfield 10.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ashton Gardens 10.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR NY1532-BVSL-BV TARRYTOWN 10.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sinclair Place 10.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Green Plains Cattle Company LLC- Eckley 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Core-Tech Wireline Services, LLC 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Volumetrics Measurement 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Limon Wind Plant 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR Parkview Medical Center 2,463 FTE
CITY-NEAR Parkview Health System 2,367 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Mary-Corwin Medical Center 1,451 FTE
CITY-NEAR EVRAZ Pueblo 1,128 FTE
NAT-TCR Plastomer Corporation 10.7 TCR
NAT-TCR DDT6 10.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Wiljo Interiors 10.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Ball FloraPlant - Arroyo Grande 10.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Jc Machine, Inc. 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fayette Janitorial LLC- ConAgra Louisville 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dawson GP Oil Crushing 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Forest Construction Company, Inc. 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.