Chickens, processing, fresh, frozen, canned, or cooked (except baby and pet food) · Mississippi

Forest Debone Plant

Forest, MS · ~717 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Forest Debone Plant runs at 45% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Chickens, processing, fresh, frozen, canned, or cooked (except baby and pet food) workplace, earning a grade A.

Forest Debone Plant: 1.5 TCR = 45% of Chickens, processing, fresh, frozen, canned, or cooked (except baby and pet food) BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Forest Debone Plant safety composite

Forest Debone Plant scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 54%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2018→2023

Forest Debone Plant injury rate improved

Forest Debone Plant's TCR fell 1.2 from 2.1 in 2018 to 0.9 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 2.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.44× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=2.1 · 2019=1.3 · 2020=1.8 · 2021=1.4 · 2022=1.5 · 2023=0.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311615 · Forest, MS AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.5 · 45% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #2/41
  • PHOTO Case Farms Goldsboro…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 48 inj
  • SIZE ~717 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Case Farms Goldsboro Processing (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Mississippi employers → · Look up another →

Forest Debone Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Forest Debone Plant averages 1.5 TCR (45% of the Chickens, processing, fresh, frozen, canned, or cooked (except baby and pet food) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Forest Debone Plant TCR series: 2018=2.1 · 2019=1.3 · 2020=1.8 · 2021=1.4 · 2022=1.5 · 2023=0.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Forest Debone Plant falls in its industry

509 Chickens, processing, fresh, f establishments

Safer than 88% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Mississippi alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 41 Chickens, processing, fresh, f employers in Mississippi.

Forest Debone Plant (717 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 619 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Forest Debone Plant
Forest Debone Plant (717 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 619 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Forest Debone Plant has more employees than the Chickens, processing, fresh, frozen, can median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.9 0.7 7 0 0
2022 1.5 0.8 5 4 0
2021 1.4 0.6 4 5 0
2020 1.8 1.1 9 4 0
2019 1.3 1.1 11 0 0
2018 2.1 1.4 12 6 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311615 · MS · Forest

509 Chickens, processing, fresh, frozen, canned, or cooked (except baby and pet food) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,083 rated employers in Mississippi with headcount on file · 22 employers in Forest, MS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Case Farms Goldsboro Processing 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fort Smith Live Haul 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Enterprise Plant 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Alabama Plant 2 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE 10D8106 PHARMA NATIONAL REDISTRIBUTION CENTER 718 FTE
STATE-SIZE MG Dyess, Inc 719 FTE
STATE-SIZE Koch Foods (Further Processing) Plant 719 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ivey Mechanical Company 720 FTE
CITY-NEAR Forest MS Complex 1,260 FTE
CITY-NEAR Raytheon_Forest_MS 840 FTE
CITY-NEAR Unipres Southeast 319 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1059 297 FTE
NAT-TCR Central Trucking, Inc AZ 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Silgan Containers Kenosha 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Isd #2155 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Frank I. Rounds Co. 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Shockwave Medical Inc 717 FTE
NAT-SIZE Forte Residential, Inc. 717 FTE
NAT-SIZE Beloit Plant 717 FTE
NAT-SIZE 401 Nicollet Mall-HQ 717 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.