Metal cans, light gauge metal, manufacturing · Wisconsin

Silgan Containers Kenosha

Kenosha, WI · ~43 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Silgan Containers Kenosha runs at 45% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Metal cans, light gauge metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Silgan Containers Kenosha: 1.5 TCR = 45% of Metal cans, light gauge metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Silgan Containers Kenosha safety composite

Silgan Containers Kenosha scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Silgan Containers Kenosha: 0.0 → 3.0 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 3.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2023

Silgan Containers Kenosha's TCR rose 3.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 3.0 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332431 · Kenosha, WI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.5 · 45% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #9/18
  • PHOTO Crown Cork & Seal US…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Crown Cork & Seal USA, Inc. - Massillon Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Silgan Containers Kenosha in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Silgan Containers Kenosha averages 1.5 TCR (45% of the Metal cans, light gauge metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Silgan Containers Kenosha TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=2.3 · 2021=2.2 · 2022=0 · 2023=3 · BLS 3.3

Where Silgan Containers Kenosha falls in its industry

217 Metal cans, light gauge metal, establishments

Safer than 74% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 18 Metal cans, light gauge metal, employers in Wisconsin.

Silgan Containers Kenosha (43 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 117 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Silgan Containers Kenosha
Silgan Containers Kenosha (43 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 117 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Silgan Containers Kenosha has fewer employees than the Metal cans, light gauge metal, manufactu median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.0 0.0 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2020 2.3 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332431 · WI · Kenosha

217 Metal cans, light gauge metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 178 employers in Kenosha, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Crown Cork & Seal USA, Inc. - Massillon Plant 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Silgan Containers Modesto Doherty 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Waussau East - D104 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ball Metalpack - Deforest, WI 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Holsum Irish Dairy 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Barron Hatchery 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Babcock Receiving 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Riverside Generating Station 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : MKE1 3,474 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - MKE1 2,936 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aurora Medical Center Kenosha 2,233 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon Transportation Services : MKE5 1,671 FTE
NAT-TCR Isd #2155 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Hart Street Warehouse 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Forest Debone Plant 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Parklane West Healthcare Center 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Seckinger Forest Products Inc 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lucky International Trading, Inc. 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Illinois 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fusion Electric & Engineering LLC 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.