Relieve hunger by redistributing nutritious food waste · Michigan

Forgotten Harvest

Oak Park, MI · ~84 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Forgotten Harvest runs at 303% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Relieve hunger by redistributing nutritious food waste workplace, earning a grade F.

Forgotten Harvest: 11.5 TCR = 303% of Relieve hunger by redistributing nutritious food waste BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Forgotten Harvest safety composite

Forgotten Harvest scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Forgotten Harvest: 3.9 → 5.2 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 25.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.45× in 2024

Forgotten Harvest's TCR rose 1.3 from 3.9 in 2017 to 5.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 25.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.45× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624210 · Oak Park, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.5 · 303% of ind

  • DART 5.2 DART
  • RANK #7/10
  • PHOTO Food Gatherers
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~84 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Food Gatherers (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Forgotten Harvest in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Forgotten Harvest averages 11.5 TCR (303% of the Relieve hunger by redistributing nutritious food waste BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Forgotten Harvest TCR series: 2017=3.9 · 2018=25.6 · 2019=11.3 · 2024=5.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Forgotten Harvest falls in its industry

147 Relieve hunger by redistributi establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 10 Relieve hunger by redistributi employers in Michigan.

Forgotten Harvest (84 employees, TCR 11.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Forgotten Harvest
Forgotten Harvest (84 employees, TCR 11.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Forgotten Harvest has more employees than the Relieve hunger by redistributing nutriti median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.2 5.2 5 0 0
2019 11.3 9.1 5 0 0
2018 25.6 25.6 11 0 0
2017 3.9 3.9 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624210 · MI · Oak Park

147 Relieve hunger by redistributing nutritious food waste employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 37 employers in Oak Park, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Food Gatherers 11.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Meals on Wheels Fairfield County 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Westmoreland County Food Bank, Inc. 11.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Good Shepherd Food Bank - Auburn 11.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Parnall East 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE Howell Service Center 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE Utilities Instrumentation Service 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harvest Energy Solutions 84 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brilar LLC 1,101 FTE
CITY-NEAR Berkley Building Blocks, Avery Center 782 FTE
CITY-NEAR Norup International School 782 FTE
CITY-NEAR Administrative Office Tyndall Center 782 FTE
NAT-TCR Arden Courts of San Antonio 11.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Maguire Tank 11.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Tincher'S Welding, LLC 11.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Public Works 11.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cedarburg Health Services 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rocky Mountain Spice Company 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pro Max Fence Systems 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE Goldsboro Nc - 290 84 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.