Fence Installtion · Pennsylvania

Pro Max Fence Systems

Reading, PA · ~84 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pro Max Fence Systems runs at 319% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Fence Installtion workplace, earning a grade F.

Pro Max Fence Systems: 8.9 TCR = 319% of Fence Installtion BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pro Max Fence Systems safety composite

Pro Max Fence Systems scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Pro Max Fence Systems: 3.8 → 11.9 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 11.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.16× in 2024

Pro Max Fence Systems's TCR rose 8.2 from 3.8 in 2016 to 11.9 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.16× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238990 · Reading, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.9 · 319% of ind

  • DART 10.3 DART
  • RANK #59/64
  • PHOTO 1-VTL-Orlando
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 30 inj
  • SIZE ~84 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 1-VTL-Orlando (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Pro Max Fence Systems in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pro Max Fence Systems averages 8.9 TCR (319% of the Fence Installtion BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pro Max Fence Systems TCR series: 2016=3.8 · 2023=11.1 · 2024=11.9 · BLS 2.8

Where Pro Max Fence Systems falls in its industry

1,634 Fence Installtion establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #59 safest of 64 Fence Installtion employers in Pennsylvania.

Pro Max Fence Systems (84 employees, TCR 8.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Pro Max Fence Systems
Pro Max Fence Systems (84 employees, TCR 8.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Pro Max Fence Systems has more employees than the Fence Installtion median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.9 10.3 15 0 0
2023 11.1 8.5 13 0 0
2016 3.8 3.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238990 · PA · Reading

1,634 Fence Installtion employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 303 employers in Reading, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 1-VTL-Orlando 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rabine Paving Mid Atlantic 8.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Detroit 8.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6535 Robertson Ave 8.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE R.W. Sauder Inc 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wilkinsburg B 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kriger Pipeline, Incorporatated 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE UGI Archbald 84 FTE
CITY-NEAR READING HOSPITAL 5,693 FTE
CITY-NEAR SAO : Reading 2,203 FTE
CITY-NEAR A077 - Penn State Health St. Joseph Medical Center 1,764 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - TEN1 1,261 FTE
NAT-TCR Al John Inc 8.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Highway Safety Devices 8.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Careone at Evesham Assisted Living 8.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Current River Nursing Center 8.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Goldsboro Nc - 290 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE Patterson Healthcare Center 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE Forgotten Harvest 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE Drake Terrace 84 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.