Beef cattle feedlots (except stockyards for transportation) · Nebraska

Fort Kearny Consolidated

Minden, NE · ~33 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.4
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fort Kearny Consolidated runs at 120% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Beef cattle feedlots (except stockyards for transportation) workplace, earning a grade D.

Fort Kearny Consolidated: 5.4 TCR = 120% of Beef cattle feedlots (except stockyards for transportation) BLS 4.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fort Kearny Consolidated safety composite

Fort Kearny Consolidated scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 62% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.3

2016→2024

Fort Kearny Consolidated injury rate improved

Fort Kearny Consolidated's TCR fell 5.3 from 7.3 in 2016 to 2.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 11.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.37× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.3 · 2017=11.7 · 2018=6.5 · 2019=2.1 · 2020=4.1 · 2021=8.7 · 2022=2.2 · 2023=4.0 · 2024=2.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 112112 · Minden, NE ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.4 · 120% of ind

  • DART 2.0 DART
  • RANK #8/18
  • PHOTO High Choice Feeders …
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: High Choice Feeders LLC (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nebraska employers → · Look up another →

Fort Kearny Consolidated in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fort Kearny Consolidated averages 5.4 TCR (120% of the Beef cattle feedlots (except stockyards for transportation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fort Kearny Consolidated TCR series: 2016=7.3 · 2017=11.7 · 2018=6.5 · 2019=2.1 · 2020=4.1 · 2021=8.7 · 2022=2.2 · 2023=4 · 2024=2 · BLS 4.5

Where Fort Kearny Consolidated falls in its industry

165 Beef cattle feedlots (except s establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Nebraska alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 18 Beef cattle feedlots (except s employers in Nebraska.

Fort Kearny Consolidated (33 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 5.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Fort Kearny Consolidated
Fort Kearny Consolidated (33 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 5.4

Fort Kearny Consolidated has fewer employees than the Beef cattle feedlots (except stockyards median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2023 4.0 4.0 2 0 0
2022 2.2 0.0 1 0 0
2021 8.7 4.3 4 0 0
2020 4.1 4.1 2 0 0
2019 2.1 0.0 1 0 0
2018 6.5 6.5 3 0 0
2017 11.7 9.3 5 0 0
2016 7.3 7.3 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

112112 · NE · Minden

165 Beef cattle feedlots (except stockyards for transportation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,594 rated employers in Nebraska with headcount on file · 7 employers in Minden, NE · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR High Choice Feeders LLC 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Yuma Feedlot 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dalhart Cattle Feeders 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Circle Three Feed Yard, Ltd 5.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Double D 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kearney - Sampson Construction 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Linhart Construction, Inc. 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sadler Electric, Inc. 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR Royal Engineered Composites 204 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kearney County Health Services 116 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minden Machine Shop, Inc 55 FTE
CITY-NEAR KAAPA Ethanol, LLC 43 FTE
NAT-TCR Grossmont Post Acute Care 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Omni San Diego Hotel 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Infld - Plainfield 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Gasaw - Kennesaw 5.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE R & R Machine Service 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Glen Burnie 10136 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gainesville 10182 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Niagara Falls 10237 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.